internationallaw

The UK government has concluded that Israel's actions in Gaza do not constitute genocide, according to a letter from former Foreign Secretary David Lammy. This decision is based on the Genocide Convention's definition, which requires specific intent to destroy a group. Despite describing Israel's bombings as "utterly appalling," the government believes there's no evidence of such intent ¹.

*Key Points:*

- *Genocide Definition:* The Genocide Convention defines genocide as acts with the specific intent to destroy a national, ethnic, racial, or religious group.
- *UK Government's Stance:* The government has shifted its position, previously stating that only courts can decide on genocide. Now, they've concluded Israel's actions don't meet the genocide threshold.
- *Civilian Deaths:* Over 63,000 people have been killed, with at least 332 Palestinians dying of malnutrition.
- *Disagreement:* The International Association of Genocide Scholars passed a resolution declaring Israel is committing genocide, citing civilian deaths, infrastructure destruction, and leaders' statements.

*What's Next?* 🤔

The UK government's decision has sparked debate, with some disagreeing with the conclusion. The situation in Gaza remains dire, with ongoing conflict and humanitarian concerns.

*Stay Informed:* 📊

Follow reliable news sources for updates on the Israel-Gaza conflict and its implications.

#IsraelGazaConflict #GenocideDebate #UKGovernment #InternationalLaw #HumanitarianCrisis

An International & Islamic Law Competition Initiative
Project Overview
Atlas Stewardship is an innovative academic and professional initiative designed to explore the intersection of sovereign wealth fund governance under international investment law and Islamic principles of ethical stewardship (Wilayah). This project aims to develop hybrid governance frameworks, foster intercivilizational dialogue, and train practitioners in managing monumental state capital through structured competitions, policy papers, and dynamic visual tools.

Core Competition Article Structure
1. Foundational Principles Integration
International Law Pillars:
Sovereign immunity and state investmentOECD Guidelines for Sovereign Wealth FundsBilateral investment treaty obligationsGlobal transparency initiatives (GAPP/Santiago Principles)
Islamic Law (Shariah) Pillars:
Concept of Maṣlaḥah (public interest)Prohibition of Gharar (excessive uncertainty) in investmentsKhalīfah (stewardship) and intergenerational equityEthical screening beyond financial returns
Principles in dialogue
2. Competition Case Studies
Participants will address real-world scenarios:
Case 1: Climate Transition Investments
Aligning Paris Agreement commitments with Shariah-compliant green financingStructuring renewable energy investments in non-Muslim majority countriesBalancing financial returns with Maslaha (public good) obligations
Case 2: Technology & AI Governance
Sovereign investment in AI under international tech governance frameworksIslamic ethical boundaries in biotechnology investmentsData sovereignty and ethical data utilization frameworks

Modern investment frontiers
3. Scoring Matrix
Criteria International Law Application Islamic Law Integration Innovative Synthesis
Weight 40% 40% 20%
Elements BIT interpretation, UNCTAD principles, ICSID precedents Maqasid al-Shariah, Fiqh methodologies, Historical Awqaf models Novel hybrid governance frameworks
Visual Educational Components
Interactive Timeline: Evolution of Sovereign Stewardship

Infographic: Conventional vs. Shariah-Compliant SWF Structures
Governance architecture comparisonEthical decision-making workflowsIntergenerational equity mechanisms
Implementation Framework
Phase 1: Global Academic Consortium
Partner with sovereign wealth research institutesDevelop modular curriculum on ethical capital stewardshipVirtual simulation rounds using real fund data
Phase 2: Institutional Engagement
Engagement with actual sovereign wealth fundsPractitioner-mentors from Norway Pension Fund, ADIA, Saudi PIFReal portfolio allocation challenges
Phase 3: Policy Impact & Dissemination
Annual policy white papersVisual governance playbooksDocumentary series: "Stewards of the Future"

Expected Outcomes
15+ Policy White Papers annually on sovereign stewardship50+ Trained Professionals in hybrid governance modelsModel Governance Charter for ethical sovereign fundsRegulatory Harmonization Proposals for cross-border ethical investment
Call to Action
Atlas Stewardship seeks:
Sovereign wealth funds for case studies and mentorshipAcademic institutions specializing in international investment lawEthical finance organizations for partnershipTechnology partners for visualization and simulation tools
@Falcon Finance #FalconFinance $FF

#IslamicFinance #InternationalLaw #SustainableFinance #rsshanto

Moscow has issued a statement that blends criticism with realism. While Russia insists that U.S. actions in Venezuela break international law, it also admits that Washington’s strategy makes sense from an American perspective.
This isn’t simply condemnation—it’s recognition of how superpowers operate.

⚖️ Key Points
Violation of Sovereignty: 
Russia argues that U.S. involvement undermines Venezuela’s independence and breaches global norms.
Acknowledging Strategy:
 By calling the moves “logical,” the Kremlin is essentially saying the U.S. is acting like any major power would—protecting influence close to home.
Energy Chessboard: 
Venezuela’s massive oil reserves make this less about ideology and more about securing control over global energy leverage.

📉 What It Means for Diplomacy & Markets
Lower Chance of Conflict: 
Russia’s softer tone hints it may avoid direct military confrontation.
Possible Power Bargains:
 The Kremlin could be signaling openness to negotiating influence zones instead of dragging out a proxy fight.
Oil Price Impact:
 If Moscow steps back, crude markets may calm, reducing the “geopolitical premium” that often drives prices higher.

#GlobalPolitics #EnergyMarket #Russia #Venezuela #USStrategy #InternationalLaw #OilReserves$BTC #MacroOutlook

government is exploring a plan to finance loans for Ukraine using £25 billion in frozen Russian state assets held in Britain. This move mirrors a similar EU proposal, aiming to support Ukraine without confiscating Russian assets outright.

*Key Details:*

- *Funding Mechanism:* The UK's approach would unlock lending capacity equal to the full value of Russian assets frozen in Britain, without violating international law.
- *Repayment Plan:* The loans would be repaid once Russia pays war reparations, a scenario considered unlikely in the near term.
- *EU's Proposal:* The European Commission has proposed raising up to €172 billion for Kyiv by converting profits from frozen Russian assets into zero-interest bonds.¹

*Global Support:*

- The UK's plan complements the EU's initiative, with both aiming to use these funds as leverage until Russia pays reparations.
- The US has also proposed using frozen Russian assets to support Ukraine, with a bipartisan group of senators introducing amendments to the REPO Act.

*Stay Alert!* 👀 Keep an eye on developments and adjust your strategy accordingly. #UkraineSupport #FrozenAssets #RussiaUkraineConflict #InternationalLaw #GlobalFinance