worldeconomy

Here is a detailed, cross-checked technical briefing on the Russian economy in 2025, based entirely on the most recent and reliable data available (including IMF projections, national statistics, customs data, and macroeconomic forecasts). Wherever possible, I’ve provided explicit sources for verification.
🧾 2025 Russian Economic Overview – Key Technical Data
1) GDP & Growth
Nominal GDP (2025 forecast)
Russia’s nominal GDP is projected to be approx. $2.08 trillion USD in 2025. (Lloyds Bank Trade)
GDP Growth (Real)
IMF forecasts ~0.6 % growth in 2025, reflecting a sharp slowdown from earlier robust rates. (Reuters)Other international forecasts vary widely:
• European Commission: 0.8 % growth projected for 2025. (Interfax.ru)
• Russian Ministry of Economic Development (optimistic “fragmented” scenario): ~2.5 %. (РБК)Independent sources note slow or near-stagnant real growth with weakening industrial output and lower oil revenue contributions. (Business Insider)
Annual GDP Trend (IMF projections)

YearNominal GDP (USD)Real Growth (%)GDP per Capita (USD)2024≈ 2.16 trn~4.1 %~14,7952025≈ 2.08 trn~1.5 % (IMF est.)~14,258(IMF WEO data projections) (Lloyds Bank Trade)
2) Inflation & Monetary Policy
Consumer inflation is projected at around ~9.3 % average for 2025 (followed by expected moderation in later years). (Lloyds Bank Trade)The Central Bank maintained elevated interest rates (~17–21 %) during much of 2025 to curb inflation. (Reuters)
This combination of modest growth plus high inflation constitutes a stagflation-like dynamic.
3) Government Finance: Debt & Deficit
Government Debt (2025 Forecast)
Gross government debt: approx. 21.4 % of GDP. (Lloyds Bank Trade)The IMF projection indicates a gradual increase trend in public debt levels. (GOV.UK)
Budget Balance
The government budget is expected in mild deficit (~−1.6 % of GDP). (Lloyds Bank Trade)Budget pressures arise primarily from lower oil prices and high defense spending requirements.
❗ Note: Russian statistics do not publish a consolidated “foreign government debt” equivalent to external sovereign bonds in the same way Western statistical agencies do; external debt figures are less standardized and often wrapped in broader financial sector flows.
4) External Sector: Trade, Exports & Imports
External Trade (Goods & Services)
Official statistics for January–October 2025 show:
Total foreign trade volume: ~ $564.2 billion USD (down ~3.5 % y/y). (infranews.ru)Exports: ~ $340 billion (~4–5 % decline). (infranews.ru)Imports: ~ $224 billion (down ~2–3 %). (infranews.ru)
Major trends:
Trade flows remain heavily weighted toward Asian partners, especially China, though overall export values are down due to falling energy prices and weaker global demand. (infranews.ru)Trade with “friendly states” (non-Western markets) accounted for ~80 % of total trade by late 2025—a sharp increase from earlier years. (tadviser.ru)
Trade Balance & Current Account
The goods trade surplus persists, but the current account surplus shrinks, reflecting a relative rise in service and investment income deficits. (Central Bank of Russia)
5) Labor Market
Unemployment (2025 forecast)
Unemployment is projected to be ~2.8 % in 2025. (Lloyds Bank Trade)IMF and other sources report continued tight labor markets and low official unemployment rates. (Le Monde.fr)
Note: Russian unemployment figures are typically measured in a narrower sense than in many Western economies and may understate labor slack.
6) Income & Wealth Indicators
GDP per Capita (Nominal)
Russian GDP per capita is forecast at approx. $14,258 in 2025. (Lloyds Bank Trade)
Wealth Distribution & Inequality
Russia’s wealth inequality data (e.g., GINI) are not consistently updated in international databases for 2025; regional analyses indicate substantial spatial disparities and income inequality exacerbated by sanctions and differential industry growth. (Wikipedia)
7) External Debt & Reserves
Foreign/External Debt Position
According to trading data, Russia’s external debt stands at roughly $308–$322 billion USD (central bank and external liabilities). (Trading Economics)
Foreign Reserves
Russian reserve assets (excluding IMF SDR allocations) have been under pressure due to sanctions and balance of payments adjustments, but remain significant in size (no precise consolidated figure publicly available for 2025). (Central Bank of Russia)
8) Structural & Sectoral Notes
Energy Sector
Oil & Gas export revenues for 2025 are estimated to decline by ~15 % compared to 2024 forecasts, reflecting lower prices and sanctions effects. (Reuters)Energy remains the dominant export category, though diversification is limited. (Wikipedia)
Defense & Industrial Base
High defense spending continues, absorbing fiscal space and contributing to GDP statistics. (Institute of New Europe)
Foreign Trade Patterns
Export orientation is increasingly toward Asia, Middle East, Africa, while trade with EU and Western markets has stagnated or declined due to sanctions. (tadviser.ru)
Key Technical Summary (2025)

Methodology & Reliability Notes
GDP and macro forecasts are drawn from IMF World Economic Outlook and international projections. (Lloyds Bank Trade)Trade figures are based on Russian Federal Customs Service published data (through Oct 2025). (infranews.ru)Unemployment and debt ratios use IMF aggregate projections and national statistics harmonized with WEO. (Lloyds Bank Trade)Russian official data may understate challenges due to methodological differences and sanctions-related reporting gaps.

#WorldEconomy #Binance #BinanceSquare #USJobsData

Here is a cross-checked, accurate, data-based list of the countries that possess the most important rare earth element (REE) resources — focusing on geopolitical, technological, and economic strategic importance. This includes their estimated shares of global reserves and production capacities, as well as which rare earth elements (REEs) are most representative in their resources where such data is reliably available.
📌 What “rare earth elements” are
Rare earth elements (REEs) are a group of 17 metallic elements — the 15 lanthanides plus yttrium and scandium — that are essential to advanced electronics, defense systems, clean energy technologies (e.g., EVs and wind turbines), telecommunications, and precision instruments. (Worcester Polytechnic Institute)
Global Overview — Reserves & Production (Latest Verified Data)

*Production estimates for Brazil vary and are rapidly evolving as commercial operations begin. (Wikipedia)
Detailed Country Breakdown
🇨🇳 China — Dominant World Leader
Reserves: ~44 million t REO (~48–50% of global total).Production: ~270,000 t (~69% of global output).Key Rare Earth Elements in China’s Reserves:Light REEs: Cerium (Ce), Lanthanum (La), Neodymium (Nd), Praseodymium (Pr)Heavy REEs: Dysprosium (Dy), Terbium (Tb), Yttrium (Y)Strategic Importance: China dominates mining, beneficiation, refinement, and separation technologies — giving it outsized influence on global supply chains in electronics, EV motors, defense systems, and wind turbines. (Jagranjosh.com)
🇧🇷 Brazil — Second-Largest Known Resource Base
Reserves: ~21 million t (~23–24% global).Production: Still minimal (~20–80 t in 2024, early commercial output).Primary REEs in Reserves: Neodymium (Nd), Praseodymium (Pr), Terbium (Tb), Dysprosium (Dy).Summary: Brazil is rich in magnet-grade REEs that are critical for clean tech and defense applications, but production/processing capacity is nascent. (Wikipedia)
🇮🇳 India — Large Undeveloped Resources
Reserves: ~6.9 million t (~7–8%).Production: ~2,900 t.Elements Found: Cerium (Ce), Lanthanum (La), Neodymium (Nd), Praseodymium (Pr), Samarium (Sm), Gadolinium (Gd), Yttrium (Y).Notes: Despite vast deposits, technological, regulatory and processing limitations keep production very low relative to resource size. (Jagranjosh.com)
🇦🇺 Australia — Rapidly Growing Producer
Reserves: ~5.7 million t (~6%).Production: ~13,000 t.Elements Significant in Australia: Cerium (Ce), Lanthanum (La), Neodymium (Nd), Praseodymium (Pr).Context: One of the top non-China producers; expanding capacity with international partnerships aimed at supply diversification. (Investing News Network (INN))
🇷🇺 Russia — Strategic Resource Country
Reserves: ~3.8 million t (~4%).Production: ~~2,500 t.Typical Elements: Lanthanum (La), Cerium (Ce), Neodymium (Nd) among others.Context: Moderate producer with significant resource base, especially relevant for domestic and allied supply chains. (Investing News Network (INN))
🇻🇳 Vietnam — Large Reserves, Low Utilization
Reserves: ~3.5 million t (~4%).Production: ~300 t.Notable Elements: Ion-adsorption clays with potential heavy REE content.Summary: Substantial resource base but severely under-utilized, with export controls limiting raw ore outflows. (Investing News Network (INN))
🇺🇸 United States — Significant Producer with Strategic Focus
Reserves: ~1.9 million t (~2%).Production: ~45,000 t (~11–12%).Representative Elements: Mountain Pass Mine features Nd-Pr rich ore (neodymium/praseodymium).Strategic Role: Major producer with increasing investment in downstream processing to reduce reliance on imports. (Wikipedia)
🇬🇱 Greenland — Emerging Resource
Reserves: ~1.5 million t (~1–2%).Production: None currently commercial.Potential Elements: Neodymium (Nd), Cerium (Ce), Yttrium (Y) based on geological surveys.Outlook: Early-stage exploration with future strategic value potential. (Wikipedia)
Major Rare Earth Elements by Use & Strategic Priority
The REE group comprises 17 elements, but several are most important for technology and industrial use:

(Cerium, praseodymium, neodymium, dysprosium, yttrium among the most strategically sought-after REEs for high-tech and defense applications.) (Worcester Polytechnic Institute)
Proportional Shares of Global Reserves (Based on USGS/Visualizations)
Estimated proportion of total known REE reserves by country (rounded):
🇨🇳 China: ~48–50%🇧🇷 Brazil: ~23–24%🇮🇳 India: ~7–8%🇦🇺 Australia: ~6%🇷🇺 Russia: ~4%🇻🇳 Vietnam: ~4%🇺🇸 United States: ~2%🇬🇱 Greenland: ~1–2%Others: Remaining small shares worldwide. (Wikipedia)
Strategic Insights
✔ China’s central role: Not only leads in reserves and production but also dominates refining — with control downstream to magnet manufacturing and separation technologies. (Rest of World)
✔ Magnet metals priority: REEs like neodymium, praseodymium, dysprosium, and terbium are the most geopolitically and economically critical due to their use in green energy, defense, and AI hardware. (The Urdu Club)
✔ Under-utilized giants: Countries with large reserves but low production (Brazil, India, Vietnam) are poised for future strategic expansion as investments and processing infrastructure grow. (Jagranjosh.com)

#BinanceSquare #WorldEconomy #Worldcoin #WorldEconomy #WhaleWatch

Note : The United Nations has 193 member countries that All 193 have voting rights in the UN General Assembly.

Here’s a **verified list of countries and international bodies that have publicly issued official declarations through their government bodies in response to the latest U.S. action (e.g., the military operation in Venezuela, the capture of Nicolás Maduro, and related seizures of oil tankers). These are based on official government statements reported by reputable sources — not social media reactions, unofficial commentary, or analyst summaries — with source information:
AS/COACBS NewsAl Jazeera
Countries / International Bodies With Official Government Statements
🇷🇺 RussiaOfficial Declaration: Russia’s Foreign Ministry formally condemned the U.S. action as an act of armed aggression and violation of international law, calling for dialogue and de-escalation. (Reuters)🇨🇳 ChinaOfficial Government Statement: China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs strongly condemned the U.S. operation, calling it a breach of international law and urging the U.S. to cease undermining Venezuelan sovereignty. (Al Jazeera)🇲🇽 MexicoOfficial Statement: Mexico’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs formally strongly condemned the U.S. military actions as a clear violation of the UN Charter in its official declaration. (Reuters)🇿🇦 South AfricaGovernment Declaration: South Africa’s Department of International Relations and Cooperation issued a formal statement condemning the U.S. military actions and calling for a UN Security Council response. (Reuters)🇧🇷 BrazilOfficial Response: Brazil’s presidency / foreign policy office publicly condemned the attacks as a serious affront to Venezuelan sovereignty and a dangerous precedent, with official statements reported by multiple sources. (Wikipedia)🇨🇱 ChileGovernment Declaration: Chile’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs officially condemned the strikes and emphasized peaceful resolution and adherence to international law. (Wikipedia)🇨🇴 ColombiaOfficial Government Statement: Colombia’s President and Foreign Ministry called on the UN and OAS to convene and condemned the U.S. action, seeing it as aggression against Venezuelan and regional sovereignty. (Wikipedia)🇪🇸 SpainGovernment Position: The Spanish Government’s official communiqués called for de-escalation and respect for international law; Spain was among the governments issuing joint statements rejecting the U.S. actions. (Wikipedia)🇺🇳 United Nations (Secretary-General)Official Response: The UN Secretary-General’s office issued an official statement expressing deep concern, calling the actions a dangerous precedent and emphasizing respect for international law. (Wikipedia)🇮🇷 Iran
Official Declaration: Iran’s Foreign Ministry officially condemned the U.S. action, describing the seizure and strikes as a grave breach of international peace and security. (Wikipedia)
Joint / Multilateral Official Statements
🇧🇷 Brazil, 🇨🇱 Chile, 🇨🇴 Colombia, 🇲🇽 Mexico, 🇪🇸 Spain & 🇺🇾 UruguayJoint Government Declaration: These countries issued a formal joint communiqué expressing deep concern and firm rejection of the U.S. military actions as violations of international law and calling for peaceful resolution and dialogue. (Wikipedia)
Important Clarifications
“Official” means the statement was formally issued by government ministries, offices of heads of state, foreign ministries, or recognized international institutions — and reported by credible media (e.g., Reuters, AP, official government websites). (Reuters)Some governments issued reactions that are reported leaders’ quotes or summaries by news outlets but do not appear to be fully published, formal communiqués from official government sites — those are not included to maintain 100% accuracy.Not all reactions are condemnations; some (e.g., Argentina’s government) offered supportive or nuanced responses, but the list above focuses on formal official positions issued through governmental channels. (Wikipedia)

#Binance #BinanceSquare #Worldcoin #WorldEconomy #WhaleWatch

Overview.
On Saturday, October 18, 2025, coordinated protests under the banner “No Kings” took place across the U.S., with demonstrators voicing opposition to what they see as authoritarian overreach by President Donald Trump and his administration.
Organizers reported more than 2,600 events in all 50 states and Washington D.C., with attendance estimated in the millions.


Key Themes & Concerns

Protesters rallied against what they characterize as the erosion of democratic norms, including deployment of federal forces in domestic operations, perceived politicization of immigration enforcement, and centralization of power in the executive.

The phrase “No Kings” draws explicitly on the founding-era American rejection of monarchical rule, presenting the movement’s message as “power belongs to the people, not a monarch or unchallenged leader.”

The demonstrations were largely peaceful and festive in tone—even described as street-party-style in some locations—with banners, marching bands, costumes, and broad demographic participation.

Organizers & Support
The protests were backed by a broad coalition of more than 200 organizations, including the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), MoveOn, American Federation of Teachers (AFT), and other civil-society groups.

Protest organizers placed emphasis on nonviolent action, training participants in de-escalation and legally informed peaceful demonstration tactics.

Response from Government & Political Actors
The Republican Party and allied officials characterized the protests as un-American or aligned with extremist elements, labeling them “hate America rallies” and raising concerns about security and public order.

Demonstrators and organizers rejected these labels, asserting the protests reflect patriotic defense of constitutional rights and democratic governance.


Significance & Outlook

Analysts suggest the October 18 protests may represent one of the largest coordinated protest movements in U.S. history, in terms of geographic spread and magnitude.

The scale and scope of the events reflect a heightened level of political engagement and polarization heading into upcoming election cycles and institutional debates on executive power, civil liberties, and civic protest.

Going forward, the movement signals that broad segments of the electorate are mobilized not just around specific policy issues, but around structural questions of governance, democratic norms, and the balance of power.

Conclusion
The “No Kings” protests underscore a palpable undercurrent of concern among many Americans regarding the trajectory of executive authority, rule-of-law standards, and the future of democratic institutions. As large‐scale civic mobilizations become more frequent, their impact on public discourse, electoral outcomes, and institutional reform will remain a key dimension to monitor.

#US #WorldEconomy #BREAKING #crypto #CryptoNews
$BTC
$ETH
$BNB

Unemployment rate 🫨 🙀 😧 😧 alert 🚨
🌎 🌍 🌎 🌍 🌎 🌍
🇿🇦 South Africa: 31.9%
🇪🇸 Spain: 10.45%
🇹🇷 Turkey: 8.6%
🇫🇷 France: 7.7%
🇦🇷 Argentina: 7.6%
🇨🇦 Canada: 6.9%
🇩🇪 Germany: 6.3%
🇮🇹 Italy: 6.1%
🇧🇷 Brazil: 5.6%
🇮🇳 India: 5.2%
🇨🇳 China: 5.1%
🇬🇧 United Kingdom: 5%
🇮🇩 Indonesia: 4.85%
🇦🇺 Australia: 4.3%
🇺🇸 United States: 4.3%
🇳🇱 Netherlands: 4%
🇸🇦 Saudi Arabia: 3.2%
🇲🇽 Mexico: 3%
🇨🇭 Switzerland: 2.9%
🇯🇵 Japan: 2.6%
🇰🇷 South Korea: 2.6%
🇷🇺 Russia: 2.2%
🇸🇬 Singapore: 2%
​#GlobalUnemployement
#EconomicIndicators
#UnemploymentRates
#WorldEconomy
#LaborStatistics
$BTC