In blockchain development, regulation is often treated as an external constraint, something to address later or avoid altogether. While this mindset may work for experimental use cases, it becomes a limitation when building infrastructure intended for real financial systems.
Designing with regulation in mind requires different trade-offs. Privacy cannot mean complete opacity, and transparency cannot mean exposing every detail. Instead, systems must allow for selective disclosure, auditability, and clear governance structures.
Dusk Network approaches infrastructure from this regulatory-first perspective. Rather than positioning decentralization as a replacement for oversight, it focuses on creating tools that can operate within existing financial frameworks. This makes it possible for institutions to explore on-chain solutions without abandoning compliance requirements.
This approach may appear slower or more complex, but it aligns more closely with how financial adoption actually happens. Infrastructure that acknowledges regulatory reality is more likely to be used beyond niche environments.
By embedding these considerations into its architecture, @Dusk positions $DUSK as a foundation for long-term, compliant Web3 systems rather than short-term experimentation. #Dusk