👍 Good knowledge

Been thinking about all these chains claiming to be "AI-ready" lately. Most just talk about TPS. Honestly? That's missing the entire point.
Speed is yesterday's metric
Here's what bugs me: everyone's obsessing over transactions per second like it's 2021. But AI systems don't just need fast transactions - they need native memory, persistent reasoning, automated settlement.
Vanry actually gets this. While other chains are racing for higher TPS, they're building infrastructure where AI can remember context between sessions, reason through decisons on-chain, and act autonomously.

The tokenomics angle nobody discusses
But here's where it gets interesting for Vanry holders. Every time an AI agent uses native memory or on-chain reasoning, that's protocol usage. Not just gas fees actual infrstructure consumption.

Think about it:
if enterprise AI systems need persistent context and explainable decisions, they're not just paying transaction fees. They are paying for intelligence infrastructure. That usage flows back to token holders through the protocol layer.
My concern though
Are we building for AI systems that don't exist yet? Most "AI agents" today are just API calls with better UX. Maybe enterprises are fine with dumb chains connected to smart external APIs.
If that's the case, all this native intelligence infrastructure might be premature. Great tech, wrong timing.

What is your take?
Does AI need native blockchain intelligence, or is fast + external AI good enough? Becuse the tokenomics only work if people actually use the intelligence infrastructure.

@Vanarchain #vanar $VANRY
{future}(VANRYUSDT)
$RIVER
{future}(RIVERUSDT)