While poking around the transparency and accountability features in Fogo's governance during that CreatorPad task, I paused when I noticed how the proposal dashboard lists votes openly but buries the wallet concentrations behind a secondary analytics tab. $FOGO holders are supposed to have equal say, or at least that's the vibe from the docs, yet one concrete observation was the vote turnout stats showing 70% of approvals coming from just the top 5% of staked addresses— a design choice that logs every transaction publicly but doesn't flag imbalances unless you dig. Another was the accountability reports, which timestamp decisions meticulously but lack any mechanism to challenge off-chain influences, like when a proposal passed despite forum discussions hinting at coordinated whale pushes. It made me reflect on how these tools feel built for show, giving the illusion of oversight while real power flows quietly upstream. If transparency is the goal, why does accountability seem reserved for those already in the loop?
@Fogo Official #fogo