That's a bold narrative—$400,000 for #BTC in 2026 if it mirrors silver's historical run. While the comparison is catchy, it's a dangerous oversimplification.
Silver and Bitcoin are fundamentally different assets: one is an ancient industrial & monetary commodity, the other a digital, scarce, network-driven macro asset. Their volatility drivers, market caps, and adoption curves don't align. Chasing a pattern based on a superficial analogy ignores Bitcoin's unique on-chain dynamics and liquidity landscape.
I'm more interested in Bitcoin's own holder behavior and ETF flows than cross-asset prophecies. Do you think these comparisons are helpful or just narrative noise?
