@Walrus 🦭/acc Web3 applications often fail quietly rather than dramatically.
They do not collapse at launch, but slowly lose reliability as usage and stored data increase.
When data becomes slow, fragmented, or unavailable, users lose confidence.
No amount of decentralization can compensate for an application that cannot reliably serve information.
Blockchains excel at verification, but applications depend on much more than that.
They depend on consistent access to user data, histories, and system state.
Ignoring storage reliability creates systems that look strong on paper but break in practice.
If Web3 wants long-term adoption, infrastructure decisions must prioritize durability and availability.
Do you think most Web3 projects underestimate how critical reliable storage really is?