What stands out to me about Dusk is how it forces the system to remember its own decisions. Not through logs or dashboards. Not by having someone piece things together later. Either an outcome is agreed on, confirmed, and carried forward as state, or it simply does not exist.
That alone changes how settlement behaves when pressure shows up. There is no second version of events. No alternate timeline built on interpretation or opinion. The network already made a call, and Dusk keeps that decision locked in.
To me, that is not really about transparency.
It is about discipline in settlement.
Systems without shared memory keep reopening the same moment over and over, trying to explain it again. Dusk makes it costly to argue with what already happened.
DUSK
0.1253
-11.57%