I have noticed that access control usually breaks quietly. An address gets approved, time goes by, people change roles, and nothing ever updates. The list stays exactly the same, doing its job long after the reason for that access no longer exists. Nothing gets flagged. Nothing triggers an alert. It just keeps allowing things to pass.
What feels different to me with Dusk is that it does not depend on old assumptions. When something executes, the question is simple and immediate. Does this transaction meet the rule right now. The answer comes from live credentials, not from an address that was trusted yesterday.
You usually only feel the difference when someone asks why an asset moved and the room suddenly goes quiet. There is no hack. No bad actor. Just a permission that quietly expired without telling anyone.
Lists fail because they stay polite and never push back.
Checks at execution fail by stopping things instantly.
DUSK
0.1234
-11.35%