@Walrus 🦭/acc #Walrus $WAL
The first real audit question in decentralized storage is never technical.
It’s personal.
Who owned the answer when it actually mattered?”
Not where the data usually lived.
Not whether the system generally worked.
But who was responsible at that exact moment
when signatures were locked, obligations active, and excuses were still forming.
This is where most storage systems quietly fail.
Availability gets reconstructed after the fact.
From logs. Screenshots. Recollections.
By then, ownership has evaporated.
Everyone remembers interacting with the data.
No one remembers being accountable for it.
Walrus doesn’t allow that fog to exist.
On Walrus, a blob lives inside a paid availability window.
Availability during that window isn’t a promise.
It’s protocol state.
So when the question arrives late
and it always does there’s no archaeology.
No timeline debates.
No “it should’ve been there” arguments.
The system already decided who was responsible.
That doesn’t make audits easier.
It makes them shorter.
And much harder to run from.