I’ve started thinking of most L1s like glass houses: great for openness, terrible for regulated finance. #Dusk is one of the few networks that’s openly designing for the opposite reality—markets where privacy is required, but accountability still exists.
The core idea is simple: you shouldn’t have to publish sensitive trade details, identities, or balances to prove a transaction is valid. Dusk leans on zero-knowledge tech so validity can be verified without turning the chain into a public ledger of everyone’s financial behavior.
What makes it feel “finance-native” is DuskDS: their settlement + consensus + data availability layer built around Succinct Attestation, aiming for fast, deterministic finality (the kind that matters when you’re settling securities, not memes).
And it’s not just speed—DuskDS uses randomly selected provisioners/committees, which is the quiet part of PoS security most people ignore until something breaks.
The “newer” move I actually like: $DUSK is going modular. Instead of forcing everyone into a custom environment, they’re pushing DuskEVM so builders can use familiar Solidity workflows while still targeting confidential financial use cases.
A big June 2025 update was Hedger—a privacy engine purpose-built for DuskEVM that combines homomorphic encryption with zero-knowledge proofs to enable confidential transactions while staying compliance-friendly. That’s the type of tooling institutions care about.
Interop got real in 2025 too: Dusk launched a two-way bridge so native DUSK can move to BEP20 on BSC and back, which is a practical step for liquidity and access while the stack matures.
Then the November 2025 upgrade that matters for 2026 narratives: Dusk + NPEX integrating Chainlink CCIP as the canonical cross-chain layer for tokenized assets issued on DuskEVM—plus adopting Chainlink data standards (DataLink + Data Streams) for verified exchange/market data on-chain. This is basically Dusk saying: “regulated assets need regulated-grade plumbing.”
On the “operational” side, mainnet being live is reflected in the migration flow: ERC20/BEP20 DUSK can be migrated to native DUSK via a burner/migration process (docs + repo detail the mechanism).
The reason I think this is underrated is because Dusk isn’t trying to win the retail attention war. It’s building for the lane where tokenized securities, compliant RWAs, and institutional-grade settlement need privacy and provability—two things most chains treat like oil and water.
What I’m watching next is straightforward: more DuskEVM traction, more “real” integrations that require verified data + compliance constraints, and whether the cross-chain RWA story becomes a default expectation (not a nice-to-have).
DUSK0.1359-18.03%