Is Vanar building entertainment infrastructure or training environments for autonomous economic agents?

I was in a bank last week watching a clerk re-enter numbers that were already on my form. Same data. New screen. Another approval layer. I wasn’t angry , just aware of how manual the system still is. Every decision needed a human rubber stamp, even when the logic was predictable.

It felt less like finance and more like theater. Humans acting out rules machines already understand.

That’s what keeps bothering me.

If most #vanar / #Vanar economic decisions today are rule-based, why are we still designing systems where people simulate logic instead of letting logic operate autonomously?

Maybe the real bottleneck isn’t money , it’s agency.

I keep thinking of today’s digital platforms as “puppet stages.” Humans pull strings, algorithms respond, but nothing truly acts on its own.

Entertainment becomes rehearsal space for behavior that never graduates into economic independence.

This is where I start questioning what $VANRY is actually building.@Vanarchain

If games, media, and AI agents live on a shared execution layer, then those environments aren’t just for users.

They’re training grounds. Repeated interactions, asset ownership, programmable identity ,that starts looking less like content infrastructure and more like autonomous economic sandboxes.