$BTC

GEOPOLITICS | Iran Insists Uranium Enrichment Not Up for Discussion in Geneva Talks

On February 15 (local time), Ebrahim Rezaei, spokesperson for the National Security and Foreign Policy Committee of Iran’s parliament, clarified the scope of the ongoing nuclear negotiations in Geneva. He stated firmly that the talks do not include any discussion on halting, suspending, or abandoning Iran’s uranium enrichment activities. Additionally, he emphasized that there are no negotiations concerning the transfer of Iran’s nuclear materials خارج the country.

According to reports cited by Jin10, these matters have already been accepted by the United States as being outside the framework of the current discussions. Rezaei’s remarks indicate that uranium enrichment remains a non-negotiable element of Iran’s nuclear program from Tehran’s perspective, reflecting the country’s longstanding position that enrichment is its sovereign right under international agreements.

Focus Limited to Nuclear Issues

Rezaei further stressed that the Geneva negotiations are strictly confined to nuclear-related issues and are not linked to Iran’s missile capabilities or its broader regional policies. He dismissed speculation that the talks could expand into discussions about Iran’s defense strategy or its role in regional geopolitics.

In his comments, he identified Israel as the primary source of instability and tension in the region. He argued that Israel’s threats and actions should not be incorporated into the Geneva negotiations. Instead, he suggested that such matters should be addressed separately through dialogue among regional countries, with the objective of fostering development, stability, and mutual interests.

Skepticism Over US Commitment

While noting that Iran’s negotiation team has entered the talks with a structured and prepared negotiation plan, Rezaei expressed caution regarding the potential outcome. He referenced what he described as Washington’s past record in previous agreements, signaling skepticism about the United States’ reliability .