I think one of the biggest misconceptions right now is that “AI + blockchain” automatically creates value.
It doesn’t.
If AI is just running off-chain and occasionally interacting with a chain for settlement, that’s not integration that’s outsourcing.
For AI to genuinely operate within Web3, the infrastructure itself has to support intelligence at the base layer.
That’s why I find the design approach of @Vanarchain interesting. It’s not just about connecting AI tools to a chain. It’s about building memory, reasoning, and execution into the chain’s architecture.
From my perspective, that changes the conversation.
Instead of asking, “Does this chain support AI?”
The better question becomes, “Was this chain designed for AI from the start?”
There’s a big difference between compatibility and intentional design.
And over time, I believe intentional design is what separates lasting infrastructure from short-term experiments.