Let me throw something out there.
Most people think the biggest problem on-chain is cost.
I’m not sure that’s true anymore.
What I see more often is hesitation.
Users pause before clicking submit.
Not because the fee is high — but because the outcome feels uncertain.
Will it go through quickly?
Will it get stuck?
Will network conditions suddenly change the result?
That uncertainty shapes behavior more than fees ever did.
FOGO feels like it’s designed around removing that doubt.
Not by promising the cheapest transactions at all times, but by aiming for consistency in how transactions are handled.
Execution that behaves the same way during quiet periods and busy ones.
Systems that don’t force users into last-minute decisions or invisible competitions.
When outcomes become predictable, something important happens.
Users stop second-guessing.
Strategies become repeatable.
Applications can assume stability instead of defensively adapting to chaos.
So here’s the real question.
When you think about using a blockchain regularly, what matters more to you?
That’s what I’m curious to see.
Drop your answer in the poll — because the future of on-chain infrastructure probably depends on how users respond to this tradeoff.