How Is Vanar Different from Solana for Everyday App Speed and Low Costs?
Vanar Chain’s “everyday speed + low cost” bet differs from Solana’s: it’s less about winning the throughput race, and more about making latency and fees predictable so consumer apps behave consistently.Vanar stays EVM-compatible (so Ethereum tooling and contracts port cleanly), then tunes the core loop. The whitepaper describes a fixed-fee model pegged to a dollar value, ~3-second blocks, and first-in/first-out ordering aiming to keep routine actions feeling similar even when activity spikes. On top of that base, the official site positions an AI-native stack: Neutron for “semantic memory” (turning files into on-chain knowledge objects) and Kayon for on-chain reasoning over that data, with Axon and Flows as the next layers to ship.The chain and key surfaces (explorer, staking, My Neutron) are live. The next test is whether the higher layers can scale without turning into off-chain glue, because predictability only matters if it holds under real usage.A wallet batches 20 micro-payments for a creator; every tap should settle fast and cost the same. Or a PayFi flow checks an on-chain invoice “Seed” before releasing funds, without an extra oracle pipeline.
Would you trade some peak speed for that predictability yes or no?