I stopped watching charts and started reading code. That shift pulled me straight into @Vanarchain s documentation, and I haven't looked back.
Most AI chains slap scripts on old EVM rails and label it progress. Vanar rebuilt the base. Neutron separates high-frequency AI reasoning from on-chain settlement agents think without gas punishing every minor decision. Kaion stands out most: on-chain verifiable reasoning that's actually trustworthy. No off-chain compute farmed to centralized servers, no fake decentralization via a hash. Real proof of output, peer-to-peer exchange of results without middlemen.
I ported a simple arbitrage bot over. Hit bugs, wrestled docs, cursed error logs. Then it ran autonomously, no babysitting servers. That moment when an agent operates independently on infra built for it feels different. Most chains are just cold ledgers; Vanar gave the blockchain something closer to a brain.
The chain holds up under pressure too: near-zero fee stablecoin transfers, fast settlement, no congestion even when volume piles on. High loads test sequencing fairness, paymaster reliability, liquidity routing production validates audits where paper can't. Recent vault inflows moved smoothly; Bitcoin anchoring secured spikes; team stayed transparent. Other chains buckle when payments dominate Vanar doesn't.
Still skeptical of long-term scale, but the foundation feels solid.
When your agent runs 24/7 without constant oversight, does the chain feel like a cost center or actual infrastructure?
