Everyone labels Vanar as a “gaming L1,” but the on-chain pattern looks closer to a consumer onboarding engine than a typical crypto economy.
~193M transactions across ~28M wallets is only ~6–7 actions per wallet. That’s not DeFi-style loyalty. That’s scale-driven onboarding where wallets are likely embedded, disposable, and invisible users aren’t “using Vanar,” they’re using Virtua, VGN, or a branded app experience.
That’s a strong adoption signal… but it creates a quiet risk.
When the chain becomes background infrastructure, the token can become background too.
So the real thesis isn’t transaction growth.
It’s economic gravity.
Can Vanar convert mass one-time activity into repeat behavior that creates fee demand, staking pressure, and real token lock-up?
If retention compounds, VANRY becomes unavoidable.
If it doesn’t, Vanar can win users while the token remains optional.
Adoption is easy.
Reflexivity is the real game.