Yes

I’ve been thinking about something for a while, and no one seems to give a direct answer: why do people always return to Binance when markets become unstable?
It’s not because major exchanges are the most innovative. It’s because they’re dependable.
When volatility hits, traders want infrastructure that doesn’t freeze, lag, or throw warning messages. They want systems that keep functioning smoothly under pressure. That reliability is what keeps capital anchored there.
What makes Fogo interesting is that it doesn’t frame itself as competing with other blockchains. It positions itself as competing with centralized exchanges.
Instead of chasing Layer 1 narratives, Fogo is focused on solving the practical reasons investors still rely on large exchange platforms.
The system runs on a single client architecture, minimizing coordination issues between different components.
Validators are positioned as professional operators rather than hobbyists, aiming for consistent uptime and performance.
Price feeds are integrated natively, reducing dependency on fragmented or delayed data sources.
Binance has labeled Fogo as an early-stage project, acknowledging that conditions can shift quickly. With a valuation around $85 million, it’s clear the market still views it as speculative.
But the bigger question remains:
If Fogo can deliver a trading experience comparable to major exchanges — while remaining fully onchain — it challenges the long-standing assumption that serious capital must sit on centralized platforms.
If that happens, institutional allocation strategies may need to be reconsidered.

@Fogo Official #Fogo $FOGO
{future}(FOGOUSDT)