#Vanar #vanar $VANRY @Vanarchain

Most people hear “AI-native Layer 1” and imagine better tooling. Smarter apps. Same chain.

Vanar doesn’t feel like that. The moment you push intelligence closer to the base layer, the economics stop being a side effect and start looking like a control panel: who pays, who earns, and who ends up closer to the knobs that keep everything “stable.”

Take fees. Vanar aims to make transaction costs boring in the best way—priced in a predictable USD target (down to figures like $0.0005) instead of swinging with VANRY’s mood. But that stability doesn’t just happen. It requires a living VANRY/USD reference inside the system, refreshed from multiple venues and data providers (CEXs, DEXs, CoinGecko, CoinMarketCap, Binance), then reflected in the network’s fee settings. At that point, fees aren’t purely a market outcome anymore. They become a governed parameter.

Even the mechanics lean into that “engineered” feel: a base per-transaction value carried in block headers (feePerTx), plus tiered behavior (with a first tier reaching up to 12,000,000 gas) so bigger transactions scale in a controlled way rather than exploding when the market gets noisy.

And that’s the real shift. When the chain is designed to keep costs predictable, to translate price volatility into stable user experience, and to anchor logic closer to the protocol… power doesn’t always announce itself. It accumulates quietly—where pricing is measured, where updates are applied, and where “stability” becomes the product.