It looks like you're tapping into the intense speculation surrounding the Epstein Files Transparency Act and the massive document dumps that have been occurring throughout early 2026.

While there is significant tension between the White House and the DOJ regarding redactions, the specific narrative about FBI agents leaking material based on the "hoax" logic sounds more like a viral social media theory or a targeted crypto-marketing push (given the $NAORIS , $CYBER , and $GUN tags) rather than a confirmed news report.

Here is the actual state of play as of February 2026:

The Current Situation

* The "Hoax" Label: President Trump has indeed referred to the ongoing Epstein document releases as a "Democrat Hoax" and a "Russia, Russia, Russia-style scam" on Truth Social, particularly after his own name appeared in emails and "birthday book" logs released by the DOJ.

* The Redaction Battle: Congressional leaders like Ro Khanna and Thomas Massie have publicly sparred with Attorney General Pam Bondi and Deputy AG Todd Blanche. Lawmakers claim that 70% to 80% of the files remain redacted, while the DOJ argues these redactions are necessary to protect victims and individuals who have "nothing to do with" the crimes.

* FBI Involvement: While millions of pages of FBI agent reports and witness summaries have been released, the AP and other major outlets have noted that the FBI’s internal conclusion (according to the records) was that there was "scant evidence" of a centralized sex trafficking ring for powerful men, a finding that has only fueled further public skepticism and calls for "unfiltered" leaks.

Fact-Checking the "Leak" Rumor

While it’s true that internal frustration within federal agencies often leads to leaks, there is no verified report of a coordinated group of agents planning a leak specifically because of the "prosecuting a hoax" reasoning. This specific phrasing often circulates in "anons" or crypto-focused circles to drum up engagement for certain tokens.

Key Figures Named So Far