EVM Compatibility Is a Shortcut — Not a Shield
One of the biggest strengths of Vanar Chain is that it’s EVM compatible. If you’re a Solidity developer, you don’t have to relearn everything. Your contracts still work. Your tools feel familiar. Wallets connect the same way. You mostly just switch the RPC, update the chain ID to 2040, and deploy.
That’s comfortable. It feels easy.
But here’s the part we don’t talk about enough — that same simplicity works both ways.
If moving to Vanar is simple, leaving is simple too.
When a chain’s advantage is “we’re EVM compatible,” it’s standing in a very crowded room. There are many other EVM chains offering similar promises: low fees, fast transactions, incentives, liquidity programs. And in a world where switching chains can be as easy as changing a configuration file, loyalty isn’t automatic.
If growth is driven mainly by short-term rewards or cheaper fees, what happens when another chain offers something slightly better?
Liquidity rotates. Apps migrate. Developers follow opportunity.
So the real question isn’t about compatibility — that’s the baseline now.
The deeper question is this:
When incentives cool down…
When fees normalize…
When the hype settles…
Why stay?
What makes Vanar more than just another option in a list of EVM networks?
Because in the long run, true lock-in doesn’t come from being easy to enter. It comes from giving people a reason they don’t want to leave.