@Binance BiBi @CZ @Fogo Official @Binance Earn Official
FOGO: Binance family, what is this method? We work hard, yet we do not gain points. We only receive minor points. What is the reason? We create original content and follow all the rules, yet our hard work goes to waste. Is this the method of Binance or the campaign leaders? What are the rules? Why don’t we get proper points? Why does our name not appear in the Top 100? Why don’t we receive rewards?
This is not just a complaint it is a voice filled with frustration and confusion.
Many of us dedicate hours every single day to supporting FOGO campaigns. We research properly, understand the project, and create meaningful content. We design creative posts, write informative and actively engage with the community. We follow every guideline carefully. We avoid copying others. We make sure our content is original, valuable, and aligned with the campaign rules. We post on time. We use the required hashtags. We complete every task honestly.
Yet despite all this hard work, we receive only minor points.
When the leaderboard is announced and our names are missing from the Top 100, it feels painful. It makes us question everything. Are we doing something wrong? Are the rules different from what we understand? Is engagement more important than creativity? Is follower count more important than originality? These questions remain unanswered.
We are not asking for special treatment. We are simply asking for fairness and transparency.
If points are awarded based on engagement metrics like likes, retweets, impressions, or follower count, then please make it clear. If quality is judged in a specific way, please explain how it is measured. Many participants may not have large audiences, but they put in sincere effort. They believe in FOGO. They promote with passion. Shouldn’t dedication and originality matter just as much as popularity?
It becomes discouraging when consistent effort brings little recognition. Some participants may feel invisible despite following every rule. Campaigns are supposed to motivate and reward community members, but when the process feels unclear, it can reduce trust and confidence.
We want to understand the system. We want to know what criteria are used for ranking. We want to know how to improve. Clear communication from campaign leaders would solve many doubts. When expectations are transparent, participants can adjust their strategies accordingly.
Hard work should not feel wasted.
Many of us genuinely support FOGO and the broader Binance ecosystem. We are not here just for rewards; we are here because we believe in the projects. But recognition is important. Fair scoring is important. Clear rules are important.
Please explain the scoring process. Please clarify the evaluation standards. Please let the community know what truly matters in these campaigns.
Because when effort is met with silence, it creates disappointment.
We simply want our dedication, creativity, and hard work to be valued and counted fairly.
