I’ve noticed a lot of new L1 launches still compete on blockspace, but in an AI era blockspace alone doesn’t create value. What matters is whether something can actually do work. If intelligence can’t remember context, explain outcomes, and execute safely, then speed doesn’t help — it just fails faster.
What makes Vanar different to me is the proof coming from live systems. Memory, reasoning and automated execution aren’t theoretical modules, they already interact with each other. That turns the chain from storage into an environment where decisions can happen and complete.
Because of that, I don’t view $VANRY as depending on constant marketing cycles. Its demand would come from usage — every automated action, settlement, or machine interaction feeds back into the same economy. If AI adoption increases, networks built around functionality should naturally capture that growth.
VANRYUSDT
Διην.
0.005838
+0.86%