Why Vanar Isn’t Racing the AI Token Narrative
This week I spent more time inside myNeutron than on charts. I pushed research files into Neutron Seeds, left for a few hours, then came back from mobile expecting the usual reset most AI tools have. It didn’t happen. Kayon pulled previous context instantly. No rebuilding prompts. No re-uploading documents. The workflow just continued where it stopped. That’s when I noticed something.
Most visible updates around Vanar lately aren’t token announcements. They’re infrastructure changes — persistent memory, MCP integrations, and a geth-based client developers can actually compile from GitHub. From the outside it looks quiet. Inside usage, it feels very deliberate. Less narrative momentum. More operational readiness.
If AI agents eventually depend on memory that survives sessions, would you notice infrastructure early — or only after everyone else already builds on it?
