$ETH Russia on Venezuela: “Illegal, but Logical” 🇺🇸
Russia has just delivered a carefully balanced message. On the surface, the Kremlin condemned U.S. actions in Venezuela as a clear violation of international law. But beneath that criticism was a striking admission: Moscow described Trump’s moves as consistent with American strategic interests.
This wasn’t praise—it was realism. Russia is signaling that it understands how power actually works in global politics.
⚖️ What This Really Means
Legal Objection:
Russia continues to hold its official position that U.S. intervention undermines national sovereignty and international norms.
Strategic Acknowledgment:
By calling the actions “consistent,” Moscow is effectively saying that the U.S. is behaving like a rational superpower—protecting influence in its own region. It’s a classic case of game recognizing game.
The Energy Dimension:
Venezuela holds the world’s largest proven oil reserves. Russia knows this conflict is less about ideology and more about control over future energy leverage and market power.
📉 Market and Diplomatic Signals
Lower Risk of Direct Conflict:
Russia’s measured tone suggests it isn’t seeking military escalation with Washington over Venezuela.
Possible Sphere-of-Influence Thinking:
This language hints that Moscow may prefer negotiations and quiet understandings over an expensive and unwinnable proxy struggle.
Oil Market Impact:
Without a strong Russian counter-response, the geopolitical risk premium on oil could ease. Markets may interpret this as reduced chances of disruption.
Bottom Line:
Russia isn’t backing down—but it’s also not rushing into confrontation. This is a calculated acknowledgment of how great powers defend their interests, even when international law takes a back seat.
#Geopolitics #Venezuela #Russia #Trump #OilMarkets #EnergySecurity #InternationalRelations $ETH #MacroStrategy
