Walrus inconsistency proofs prevent serving corrupted sliver

Walrus inconsistency proofs prevent serving corrupted slivers as “valid reads”
Walrus tries to make “valid reads” harder to fake by pairing every returned data piece with a proof that the piece matches what was originally committed. The network splits large blobs into many small slivers, stores them across operators, and makes clients verify replies instead of trusting a single node. If a node serves a corrupted sliver, an inconsistency proof can be produced and shared so other clients reject it and the protocol can penalize the operator.It’s like a checksum receipt that proves the shop gave you the wrong item.fees for storing/retrieving, staking for storage operators, governance for rules and tuning.
I still don’t know how cleanly this works when clients skip verification to save time.
#Walrus  @Walrus 🦭/acc   $WAL 
WAL
0.0805
+6.48%

.css-1iqe90x{box-sizing:border-box;margin:0;min-width:0;color:#EAECEF;}Walrus inconsistency proofs prevent serving corrupted slivers as “valid reads”

Walrus inconsistency proofs prevent serving corrupted slivers as “valid reads”