defi

Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong has strongly criticized the U.S. Senate Banking Committee’s proposed crypto market structure bill. According to him, the bill would harm the crypto industry more than if there were no regulation at all. Armstrong shared his position on platform X (formerly Twitter), warning of serious consequences the legislation could have for decentralized finance, user privacy, and market competition.

Coinbase: This Bill Threatens the Future of Crypto
Armstrong pointed out that the Senate’s proposal would:

🔹 Ban tokenized stocks

🔹 Restrict the DeFi sector

🔹 Give the government access to users’ financial data

🔹 Undermine the CFTC’s role while empowering the SEC

🔹 Penalize stablecoins and block fair competition with traditional banks
He warned that the bill, in its current form, would damage innovation and strengthen the monopoly of large financial institutions. Nevertheless, Coinbase plans to continue working on improving the bill through dialogue with lawmakers.
“We appreciate the lawmakers’ bipartisan efforts, but this version is significantly worse than the status quo. We would prefer no bill over a bad one,” Armstrong stated.

Crypto Market Grows, While Regulation Lags Behind
Ironically, this debate comes at a time when the crypto market is surging again. The total market capitalization grew 3% in the past 24 hours, with Bitcoin heading toward $98,000 and Ethereum nearing $3,500.
Industry experts agree that clear legislation is needed to define when a digital asset is a security and when it is a commodity. While the proposed bill does grant more power to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), it also contains sections that could hinder the growth of stablecoins—therefore blocking the development of decentralized financial services.

137 Amendments Filed, Banks Accused of Influence
The bill has triggered a wave of public responses. So far, over 137 amendments have been submitted, with final wording expected after further negotiations. Meanwhile, crypto industry groups accuse banks of wielding excessive influence over the bill’s content.
Summer Mersinger, CEO of the Blockchain Association, stated that banks are pushing to shape the law in their favor, preventing new players from entering the market. Proposed limitations on stablecoin rewards would, she said, hurt consumers and block innovation before it can compete.

#coinbase , #CryptoNews , #brianarmstrong , #Stablecoins , #defi

Stay one step ahead – follow our profile and stay informed about everything important in the world of cryptocurrencies!
Notice:
,,The information and views presented in this article are intended solely for educational purposes and should not be taken as investment advice in any situation. The content of these pages should not be regarded as financial, investment, or any other form of advice. We caution that investing in cryptocurrencies can be risky and may lead to financial losses.“

As Web3 matures, one question keeps coming up: how can blockchain remain private while still meeting regulatory standards? Dusk Network was built to answer exactly that challenge. Unlike general-purpose blockchains, Dusk is a Layer 1 designed specifically for privacy-preserving and compliant financial applications.
Using advanced zero-knowledge cryptography, Dusk enables confidential transactions and smart contracts without hiding the legitimacy of activity. This approach makes it ideal for use cases like tokenized securities, private DeFi, and institutional-grade financial products, where both privacy and compliance are non-negotiable.
The network is powered by its native token $DUSK which plays a central role in staking, governance, and securing the ecosystem. Validators and participants are incentivized to maintain network integrity while supporting scalable and energy-efficient consensus. This long-term design positions Dusk as infrastructure, not hype.
As regulations around digital assets become clearer worldwide, blockchains that proactively address compliance while protecting user data will stand out. Dusk Network is not trying to retrofit solutions later — it’s building them into the protocol from day one.
For creators and builders looking to understand where regulated Web3 is heading, Dusk is a project worth following closely. Stay updated with the latest ecosystem developments by following @Dusk and exploring what privacy-first, compliant blockchain technology can unlock next.
The future of decentralized finance will be private, compliant, and secure — and Dusk Network is helping shape that future.
#dusk #defi #creatorpad #BinanceSquare #Write2Earn

The Dusk Foundation is the non-profit organization behind the development and stewardship of the Dusk Network, a blockchain protocol designed to enable regulated and privacy-preserving decentralized finance (DeFi). As reflected in the visual identity shown in the image—minimal, secure, and compliance-oriented—the foundation’s mission is to bridge the gap between traditional financial systems and blockchain technology without compromising confidentiality or regulatory requirements.
At its core, the Dusk Network is built to support privacy-preserving smart contracts. Unlike many public blockchains where transaction data is fully transparent, Dusk leverages advanced cryptographic techniques, including zero-knowledge proofs, to ensure that sensitive financial information remains confidential. This makes it particularly suitable for real-world financial use cases such as securities issuance, asset tokenization, and compliant financial marketplaces, where data privacy is not optional but mandatory.
One of the defining principles of the Dusk Foundation is regulated DeFi. Rather than positioning itself in opposition to financial regulation, Dusk embraces compliance with global and local legislation. The network is designed to allow institutions to meet regulatory obligations—such as KYC, AML, and reporting—while still benefiting from decentralization, automation, and efficiency. This focus is visually echoed in the image through structured layouts, lock iconography, and references to compliance and “a single source of truth.”
The Dusk Network also emphasizes instant settlement of transactions, an important requirement for modern financial markets. Traditional settlement systems often rely on intermediaries and delayed reconciliation, which can introduce risk and inefficiency. Dusk’s blockchain architecture enables near-instant finality, reducing counterparty risk and operational overhead while maintaining cryptographic security.
Governance within the ecosystem is another key focus. Tokens on the Dusk Network are governed by privacy-preserving smart contracts, ensuring that voting, staking, and protocol-level decisions can be carried out securely without exposing participant identities or sensitive data. This aligns with the foundation’s broader goal of creating a trustworthy infrastructure that institutions and developers can confidently build upon.
The Dusk Foundation itself is headquartered in the Netherlands and operates as a steward of open-source development, research, and ecosystem growth. It supports developers, researchers, and partners working on applications that require both decentralization and compliance, such as security token platforms and regulated financial instruments. By separating governance and protocol development from for-profit motives, the foundation reinforces transparency and long-term sustainability.
Overall, the image captures the essence of the Dusk Foundation’s philosophy: a calm, secure, and structured approach to blockchain innovation. By combining privacy, regulation, and decentralization, the Dusk Foundation aims to make blockchain technology viable for real-world finance—bringing DeFi closer to institutional adoption while preserving the core values of trust, security, and user sovereignty.
@Dusk #Dusk $DUSK #BinanceSquareFamily #blockchain #defi #dusk

Decentralized finance is evolving, and @Dusk is leading that evolution with a strong focus on compliance and privacy. Unlike most public blockchains where all data is visible, Dusk Network allows financial institutions and developers to build applications where sensitive information remains confidential. This makes it ideal for real-world assets, security tokens, and regulated DeFi products.
The $DUSK token is at the heart of this ecosystem, enabling staking, governance, and secure transaction execution. With features like privacy-preserving smart contracts and on-chain confidentiality, Dusk bridges the gap between traditional finance and blockchain technology. As institutional adoption increases, platforms that respect both user privacy and regulatory frameworks will gain massive relevance. Dusk Network is not following trends—it’s building the foundation for the next generation of compliant DeFi.
#Dusk #defi #RWA #cryptofuture #Web3

The wait is over—2026 is officially the year of $DUSK . With the mainnet now live, @Dusk has transitioned from a visionary project to a functional powerhouse for institutional finance.
The launch of DuskEVM is a game-changer, allowing developers to deploy Solidity-based smart contracts with built-in privacy. This enables the DuskTrade platform to onboard over €300M in regulated securities, proving that RWAs can thrive on-chain. By combining EVM compatibility with "auditable privacy," #Dusk is providing the exact toolkit banks need to tokenize bonds and equities under MiCA regulations. The future of finance has arrived.
#dusk #RWA #Mainnet #ZKP #defi

Bank of Italy–Style Models: Ethereum Collapse and Infrastructure Risk
Abstract
As blockchain networks become systemically important, central banks and financial institutions are increasingly studying the infrastructure risks embedded in public blockchains. Using modeling approaches similar to those employed by institutions like the Bank of Italy, this article explores a hypothetical scenario: What happens if Ethereum suffers a large-scale collapse? We analyze Ethereum as a financial infrastructure, identify fragility points, and explain how network stress can propagate across decentralized finance (DeFi), stablecoins, and global crypto markets.

1. Ethereum as Financial Infrastructure, Not Just a Token
Ethereum is no longer just a cryptocurrency. It functions as:
A settlement layer for DeFiA collateral backbone for stablecoinsA smart-contract execution engineA liquidity hub for NFTs, bridges, and Layer-2s
From a central-bank modeling perspective, Ethereum resembles a financial market infrastructure (FMI)—similar to payment systems or clearing houses.
➡️ This means Ethereum failure risk is systemic, not isolated.

2. How Central Banks Model Infrastructure Risk
Institutions like the Bank of Italy typically use:
Network theory modelsStress-testing frameworksAgent-based simulationsLiquidity contagion models
Applied to Ethereum, these models focus on:
Node concentrationValidator incentivesLiquidity dependenciesSmart-contract interconnections
The goal is to answer one question:
Can a shock in one part of the system cascade into total failure?

3. Key Fragility Points in Ethereum’s Architecture
3.1 Validator Concentration Risk
Ethereum’s Proof-of-Stake relies on validators, but:
Large staking providers control a significant shareRegulatory pressure on validators can cause coordinated exitsSlashing events can amplify panic
📉 Model Outcome: Reduced validator participation → slower finality → loss of trust.

3.2 DeFi Liquidity Feedback Loops
Ethereum hosts massive leveraged positions through:
Lending protocolsLiquid staking tokens (LSTs)Synthetic assets
In stress models:
ETH price dropsCollateral ratios failLiquidations spikeGas fees surgeNetwork congestion worsens
This creates a negative reflexivity loop.

3.3 Stablecoin Dependency Risk
Most major stablecoins depend on Ethereum rails.
If Ethereum stalls:
Stablecoin redemptions slowArbitrage breaksPeg instability increases
📊 Central-bank-style simulations show that stablecoin stress accelerates systemic collapse faster than price volatility alone.

4. Hypothetical Ethereum Collapse Scenario (Modeled)
Phase 1: Shock Event
Regulatory action, major exploit, or validator outageETH price drops sharply
Phase 2: Liquidity Freeze
DeFi protocols halt withdrawalsBridges become bottlenecksGas fees spike uncontrollably
Phase 3: Contagion
L2s fail due to Ethereum dependenceCross-chain liquidity dries upStablecoin confidence erodes
Phase 4: Market Repricing
ETH loses its “risk-free crypto collateral” statusCapital migrates to alternative chains or exits crypto entirely

5. Why This Matters Beyond Crypto
From a Bank-of-Italy-style macro view:
Crypto markets are increasingly interlinked with traditional financeEthereum acts as a shadow settlement layerFailure could impact:Crypto fundsPayment startupsTokenized real-world assets (RWA)
This is why regulators study Ethereum not as innovation—but as infrastructure risk.

6. Risk Is Structural, Not Technical
Important insight from infrastructure modeling:
Ethereum does not fail because of bad code alone —
it fails when economic incentives, liquidity, and trust break simultaneously.
Even perfect technology cannot survive:
Liquidity runsGovernance paralysisConfidence collapse

7. Can Ethereum Reduce Collapse Risk?
Mitigation strategies identified in systemic models include:
Validator decentralizationBetter liquidation throttlesReduced DeFi leverageMulti-chain settlement redundancy
However, no system is collapse-proof—only collapse-resistant.

Conclusion
Using modeling logic similar to that applied by the Bank of Italy, Ethereum emerges as a critical but fragile financial infrastructure. A collapse would not be a simple price crash—it would be a network-wide liquidity and trust failure, with cascading effects across the crypto ecosystem.
For traders, builders, and policymakers, the lesson is clear:
Ethereum risk is no longer speculative risk — it is systemic infrastructure risk.

$ETH

Ahead of a critical Senate hearing on the CLARITY Act, blockchain and decentralized finance (DeFi) advocacy groups are ramping up pressure. The DeFi Education Fund, a prominent defender of open financial protocols, is sharply criticizing eight proposed amendments, warning they could severely damage DeFi technology and software development rights.
According to the Fund, these proposed changes pose significant legal and technical threats to decentralized innovation. The group is urging senators to reject proposals put forth by lawmakers such as Jack Reed, Catherine Cortez Masto, and Elizabeth Warren, which are set to be reviewed during a hearing on Thursday, January 15, 2026.

Senate Under Fire: CLARITY Act Faces Pushback from DeFi Community
The DeFi Education Fund argues that several of the amendments could:

🔹 Empower the Treasury to sanction smart contracts

🔹 Narrow the legal definition of “non-custodial developers”

🔹 Expand FinCEN’s authority over blockchain platforms

🔹 Ban transactions involving “illegal” DeFi protocols
For example, Amendment 42 could grant broad powers to prosecute smart contracts based on potential misuse. Amendment 75, introduced by Sen. Cortez Masto, could lead to a blanket ban on certain decentralized transactions.
“We must ensure that it is people, not code, that are held accountable — or we risk crushing open innovation,” said Amanda Tuminelli, Chief Legal Officer at the DeFi Education Fund.

Crypto Community Mobilizes: Scoring Senators and Fighting Back
The DeFi Education Fund partnered with the Stand with Crypto campaign to grade senators based on how they vote on DeFi-related issues. Special attention has been drawn to Sen. Warren, who submitted over 20 amendments, including one that removes exemptions for airdrops and other token distributions.
While some amendments raise red flags, the Senate Banking Committee, led by Republican Tim Scott, released a “Myths vs. Facts” document aiming to clarify misconceptions. According to the committee, the CLARITY Act:

🔹 Protects legitimate software development

🔹 Does not threaten the banking system

🔹 Establishes clear accountability for fraud and market manipulation

🔹 Seeks to prevent future collapses like FTX

The Battle Over Crypto Regulation Intensifies
While the House passed its version of the CLARITY Act in July 2025 with bipartisan support (294–134), the Senate debate is heating up.
Coinbase has threatened to withdraw support if the current version limits stablecoin rewards. Critics argue that the bill disproportionately favors established players like Coinbase and Circle while undermining smaller innovators and open-source developers.
Supporters of the legislation stress the urgency of passing a regulatory framework before the November 2026 midterm elections. If the political landscape shifts, much of the current progress could be undone.

#CLARITYAct , #defi , #Web3 , #CryptoRegulation , #Stablecoins

Stay one step ahead – follow our profile and stay informed about everything important in the world of cryptocurrencies!
Notice:
,,The information and views presented in this article are intended solely for educational purposes and should not be taken as investment advice in any situation. The content of these pages should not be regarded as financial, investment, or any other form of advice. We caution that investing in cryptocurrencies can be risky and may lead to financial losses.“