#BinanceSquare Innovation or unnecessary noise?

#

Since its launch, Binance Square aspired to become the meeting place for traders, content creators, and cryptocurrency enthusiasts. But today, many active users see it more as an empty promise than as a useful tool.

Some even say it outright: Binance Square is useless.

Why do we feel it doesn't work?

1. Too much noise, little value

Most posts are repetitive, empty, or outright spam. It's hard to find useful content among so much self-promotional material disguised as analysis.

2. Lack of real curation

There is no system that rewards quality. The most visible content tends to be the ones that receive automatic likes, not necessarily the most valuable.

3. Artificial interactions

The community doesn't feel genuine. Many comments are bots or simply exchanges of likes. There are no debates, no learning, no collective building.

4. No real incentives to contribute serious content

Why share in-depth analysis if there is no real recognition? The current system does not motivate the creation of educational or technical content.

To Binance Square, directly:

We like Binance. We trust the platform.

But Binance Square, today, is not providing us anything.

The intention is good. The tool has potential.

But if you want the community to participate, we need more than a feed of empty posts.

We want curated content by quality, not by popularity.

We want serious analysis to be rewarded, not superficial noise.

We want a real community, not a race for likes.

Conclusion: Binance Square could be much more. But today, it is not delivering.

The community is willing to contribute, but we need Binance to listen and adjust the course too.

Are you listening to us?