To judge the quality of a public blockchain, it is not about looking at the beautiful PPTs it presents during calm times, but rather observing whether it 'drops the chain' when the market experiences an epic surge or crash, and the entire network's traffic is suddenly maxed out.

In recent years, we have seen too many public blockchains that are 'gods in sunny weather and demons in rainy weather.' At critical moments, they either crash (I won't name a certain high-performance chain), or the Gas fees skyrocket to the point where you want to smash your computer, leaving your assets unable to move while you watch helplessly. This is a typical 'fragile system.'

The reason I heavily invested in @Plasma ($XPL ) is that I see it as a **'anti-fragile system'** in the Web3 world.

Its underlying Reth (Rust) engine was designed from the outset to handle extreme concurrency and massive data throughput. It is like a heavy armored vehicle; while it may not show advantages when driving on city roads, when the bullets start flying (massive transaction requests), other fragile vehicles fall apart, and it can still move steadily forward.

Investment is about investing in certainty.

True certainty does not come from the promises of project teams, but from the engineering capability that remains **'error-free'** under extreme pressure.

Plasma is the kind of chain you would dare to entrust with your life and fortune to make critical transactions during a market crash. #Plasma