🚨 Does BIP-110 threaten the smoothness of Bitcoin transactions?
In the world of Bitcoin, any new technical proposal can make a significant difference…
But this time, the concern is real ⚠️
🔍 Independent analyst Kyle Torbi raised a sensitive point:
The BIP-110 proposal not only adds a new option,
but it may directly interfere with transactions already ongoing on the Bitcoin network.
💡 Here lies the problem:
Some previous proposals, like Covenants
➜ were optional
As for BIP-110
➜ it may affect the current operation of the network without a clear option to ignore
😟 This is what worries developers and the community:
Will it lead to the disruption of existing transactions?
Is the risk greater than the benefit?
And does Bitcoin need this change now?
⚖️ Development is important…
but stability is more important.
And a network the size of Bitcoin cannot afford hasty decisions.
🗣️ Now it's your turn:
Do you see BIP-110 as a step forward or an uncalculated risk?
Write your opinion, share the post, and press like if you care about the future of Bitcoin 👇
$BTC
