I’m looking at Plasma as a project that starts from a simple idea: stablecoins are already the main thing people actually use in crypto, so the base layer should be built around them, not around speculation. Instead of being a general chain that also supports stablecoins, they’re designing the whole system with stablecoin settlement as the priority.

At the system level, Plasma is a Layer 1 that stays fully EVM-compatible, so developers don’t need to change how they build. Transactions finalize in under a second, which matters if you’re moving dollars and not NFTs. They’re also removing friction by letting users send USDT without paying gas in a volatile token. You use stablecoins, and you pay fees in stablecoins. That sounds small, but it changes who can realistically use the network.

Security-wise, they’re anchoring parts of the system to Bitcoin. The goal isn’t speed, it’s neutrality and resistance to censorship, which matters for payments and institutions.

The purpose behind Plasma is practical. They’re not trying to reinvent crypto culture. They’re trying to build quiet infrastructure that people and businesses can actually rely on to move stable value at scale.

@Plasma #plasma

$XPL