If Ethereum is a DOS system, then Vanar's current completion level is just a blue screen of Windows 95.
Nowadays, it seems like any project must ride the wave of AI hype to hold its head up in front of VCs. But if you carefully peel back the so-called AI public chain's outer layer, what you find inside is still the same inefficient EVM logic. Most projects' so-called innovations are nothing more than forcefully hashing off-chain AI model results onto the chain; this kind of plug-in AI is no different from putting a navigation device on a horse-drawn carriage decades ago. This is also why I pay extra attention when testing Vanar Chain. The core impact it had on me is its invisibility. For true Web3 mass adoption, users should not even be aware that they are using blockchain. Vanar's almost imperceptible gas fee strategy and account abstraction system finally provide hope for overcoming mnemonic phrase phobia. I tried deploying a simple generative NFT script, and the entire process was as smooth as calling OpenAI's API, rather than battling with Ethereum's congested memory pool. In comparison to Solana, while Solana is fast, that is a physical layer's brute force piling, and for AI, which requires complex logical interactions, its developer tools are still too rigid. Vanar clearly aims to be the translator between Web2 and Web3, allowing traditional Java or Python developers to directly write smart contracts, and in terms of technical stack affinity, it indeed has an edge. However, while it's nice to talk, the problems are also glaringly obvious. Vanar's current browser and data dashboard are shockingly rudimentary; trying to track an internal transaction of a cross-contract call can make one collapse from searching for data. Moreover, although the underlying layer claims to support AI natively, the official AI oracle interface documentation is vague, and many functions are still in the drawing board phase. If we compare the current public chain to operating systems, Ethereum is DOS, which can only play Minesweeper due to its slowness, while Vanar wants to be Windows, enabling ordinary people to use it, but its current completion level is just at the level of Windows 95, with blue screens and bugs being inevitable. But at least the direction is right; in this era filled with air coins, projects that can focus on middleware experience are worth adding to the watchlist for a while.
@Vanarchain $VANRY
