The value of Dusk lies in the right transparency, at the right time
When studying the Dusk Network, one specific aspect changed my perception of how blockchain can function in the financial market: the concept of selective transparency. Not everything needs to be public all the time—and in finance, this is essential.
In traditional financial systems, audits happen on demand, with controlled access to relevant information. In fully public blockchains, this control practically doesn't exist. Sensitive data is exposed, creating unnecessary risks and deterring institutions.
Dusk resolves this dilemma by allowing information to remain confidential by default, yet auditable when required. This means regulators, auditors, or authorized parties can verify transactions without the entire market having access to the data. To me, this is one of the most mature aspects of the proposal.
This approach reduces information asymmetry, prevents exposure of strategies, and protects participants without compromising trust in the system. In practical terms, it brings blockchain closer to the actual functioning of the financial market, rather than forcing the market to adapt to the technology.
Another important aspect is how this controlled transparency connects to compliance. Dusk does not attempt to circumvent regulations; instead, it embeds regulatory requirements directly into the protocol's design. This makes the issuance, trading, and settlement of assets much more viable in regulated environments.
The DUSK token plays a functional role within this ecosystem, supporting security and economic incentives. It helps maintain the balance between privacy, verifiability, and operational stability of the network.
After observing this model, my conclusion is clear: Dusk does not advocate for less transparency, but for the right transparency. In the financial market, this makes all the difference.