【 Banning InfoFi: Seems unreasonable, and actually unreasonable too 】

One common awakening, the mouth pulling the sky collapsing!

X product manager posted on Twitter banning API calls related to InfoFi projects...

AI spam tweets and AI comment replies are indeed annoying, so blaming InfoFi isn't entirely unfair. But the real focus should be on banning those who create the garbage. Don't say algorithms can't handle it—back then, experts claimed rocket recovery was impossible, yet your boss still made it happen!

Without InfoFi, the timeline will be temporarily quiet, but later it will likely be full of AI spam again, because without project rewards to pull, AI bots will just go after the two-week "salary" instead. What if this happens? Should we optimize the algorithm or optimize you?

This kind of fundamental approach may seem unreasonable, but it's actually unreasonable—banning InfoFi might lead to killing the chicken for the egg, draining the pond to catch fish.

What will the mouth-pulling army do next?

⚞ Pulling X's salary

⚞ Moving to Binance Square

⚞ Waiting for Kaito Studio

Lastly, a note on Huma @Huma Finance 🟣 — Huma's content academy seems to be the next phase of InfoFi evolution.