In the current cryptocurrency market, the term 'privacy' is overused. Many projects tout anonymity, obfuscation, and untraceability as core selling points, yet rarely discuss a real issue: how will privacy coexist with compliance when cryptocurrency assets truly enter mainstream finance and real applications?
This is exactly why I started to refocus on @Dusk .
Dusk is not a project that attempts to fight against regulation; on the contrary, its design logic has been centered around 'verifiable privacy' from the very beginning. This means that user data and transaction details can be protected, but when necessary, can still prove their legality to regulatory bodies. This is particularly important in the current environment.
Many people are unaware that traditional finance is not afraid of blockchain; what it truly fears is the 'inexplicable'. When banks, auditing institutions, and regulatory bodies face a string of on-chain addresses and transaction hashes, what they lack is a logical framework that can be understood and verified. Dusk attempts to build a bridge using cryptographic tools like zero-knowledge proofs to convert on-chain transparency into off-chain acceptable compliance language.
From this perspective, $DUSK 's value is not only reflected in price fluctuations, but also in whether it can support such a set of infrastructure. If more real-world assets, financial products, and identity systems need to be on-chain in the future, then the foundational layer of 'privacy + compliance' will no longer be optional, but a necessity.
This is also why I believe #dusk is not suitable for judgment based on short-term emotions. It is more like paving the way for a stage that has not yet fully arrived. The market often overlooks these foundational constructions during bustling times, but true value often quietly accumulates during such 'undervalued' phases.