Recently, while watching posts from @Vanar , I discovered a counterintuitive silence.
In the past, project teams would release hundreds of announcements a day, boasting about how fast their TPS was and how impressive their partnerships were.
But Vanar has changed recently. It is no longer eager to launch new features, but instead has begun to widely share in-depth insights from independent builders and researchers.
This strategy of 'speaking through others' reminds me of a harsh reality:
In the bubble-filled field of AI + Crypto, self-produced content has been labeled as 'Shill'. Only genuine external voices are the true source of information.
▰▰▰ AI's 'field survival experiment'
I've been pondering a question these past few days:
When we throw an AI Agent onto the chain and let it run 24 hours without supervision, what does it fear the most?
It's not afraid of high gas fees, nor is it afraid of chain congestion.
It fears 'fragmentation'.
Traditional blockchains are designed as one-time transaction venues for humans. Once the transaction is done, humans leave, and the chain doesn't need to remember who I am.
But AI Agents are different. They need to be online long-term, they need to remember the decision logic from three days ago, and they need to verify the source of data.
If the chain cannot provide this 'Persistent Memory', then AI on the chain is just a blind entity that could crash at any moment.
Vanar's current actions are actually conducting a survival pressure test.
The Neutron (semantic compression) and myNeutron applications it creates are not to show off skills, but to prove:
In this harsh decentralized environment, Agents can survive on 'on-chain memory'.
▰▰▰ The 'lag' of market sentiment.
Look at $VANRY the market, the price is hovering around $0.008, and the trading volume hasn't exploded.
Many people might think this project is dead.
But in my eyes, this is precisely a mature signal where quality is prioritized over quantity.
There are no mindless pumps, no panic selling, only tokenomics slowly deflating through real interactions (myNeutron).
This is a very advanced form of 'bottom grinding'.
Powerpei's independent judgment:
Vanar is betting on a long-term logic: Usage (real utilization) will eventually replace Narrative (narrative).
It is now like an engineer quietly laying down a power grid; although it hasn't been electrified (the Agent economy hasn't exploded), the poles are already set at every household's door.
For such a project that is 'extremely forward-looking in direction but slow in execution rhythm', short-term price fluctuations are actually just noise.
If you believe 2026 is the year AI will independently survive, then Vanar is the one providing AI with the 'survival backpack'.
Don't rush to place your bets, first understand this experiment.
Once myNeutron has real data spinning, the valuation model will completely change.