Should Bitcoin change to be "better"? Michael Saylor says don’t even think about it 🙅♂️💎
Sometimes, in the crypto world, the hardest thing is not to touch anything. Recently, Michael Saylor issued a warning that makes us think: Is it a good idea to "upgrade" the Bitcoin protocol to make it more functional or "green"? 🔋
For Saylor, the answer is a resounding NO. Here’s why his view is so decisive:
🔹 Immutability is the treasure: The true magic of Bitcoin is not its speed, but that it is "solid money". If we start changing the rules of the game to please trends or external pressures, we lose the trust that makes it unique. 🛡️
🔹 The risk of "improvements": Many proposals that seek to make it more efficient can end up compromising its decentralization. If it becomes easy to change, it becomes easy to control. And no one wants a Bitcoin controlled by a few. 🚫🏢
🔹 Digital gold vs. Software: While common software lives on constant updates, Saylor sees Bitcoin more as digital property. Gold does not need to "update" to be valuable, and neither does Bitcoin. 🥇
What do you think? Do you believe Bitcoin needs to evolve technically or does its strength lie precisely in staying as it is? 🤔💬
I’ll read your comments! 👇
#bitcoin #MichaelSaylorBTC #Criptomonedas #blockchain #FinanzasDigitales $BTC
Disclaimer ⚠️
The information provided in the previous post is for informational and educational purposes only. It should not be interpreted as financial, investment, legal, or tax advice.🚫
Investments in cryptocurrencies and decentralized finance (DeFi) involve significant risks, including the potential total loss of the invested capital.⚠️
Always do your own research (DYOR - Do Your Own Research) 🫵🏻