After a thorough look, the point that interests me the most is: it seems to be attempting to bring AI technology down from the pedestal of tech giants, transforming it into a more 'civilian' blockchain infrastructure. We often say AI is the future, but the cost and technical barriers to training and using advanced AI models remain insurmountable for ordinary developers and small teams.
Vanar's 'AI-native' design, such as the Neutron layer capable of handling complex data and the on-chain inference engine, appears to aim to package this capability into a public service akin to 'water, electricity, and coal.' Developers do not need to build AI from scratch and can focus more on the application logic itself. This might give rise to a batch of on-chain games or social applications that we have yet to imagine.
Of course, this path tests the team's technical and ecological operational capabilities. But if it can truly lower the application barrier for AI and attract a group of creative developers, then the network effect behind $VANRY could be quite interesting. Are you optimistic about this public chain development approach of 'lowering the core technology barrier'?
