I have recently started to view $VANRY less as a "currency for paying Gas." If we understand it this way, it is actually undervalued. At least in the ecosystem of #Virtua and #VGN , VANRY functions more like a value joint, positioned between experience and system operation.
To start with the most intuitive feeling: in Virtua, many operations make you hardly feel the presence of the chain, but VANRY is always working in the background. The reason why asset creation, interaction, and content invocation are so smooth is largely due to costs being kept low and stable enough. Here, VANRY is less about transaction fees and more about being the fuel that keeps the experience running.
However, what truly makes me feel its role is not simple is the VGN side. VGN is more inclined towards content and interactive ecosystems, with frequent user behavior and fast pacing; if the value transfer is not smooth, it can easily get stuck. VANRY here acts more like a lubricant that connects different scenarios—it's not stealing the show, but without it, the system would clearly become rough.
There is actually a contradiction here:
If $VANRY is just Gas, its presence should be as minimal as possible; but if it is a value joint, it must be used genuinely. Vanar is currently pursuing the latter path, which means VANRY is not just a cost unit, but a part embedded in the experience.
I personally tend to agree with this design. In a truly healthy ecosystem, tokens should not only settle in the background but should flow naturally with usage. The position of VANRY in Virtua and VGN is already beginning to approach this state.
@Vanarchain $VANRY #Vanar
