#Plasma $XPL @Plasma The square task has become increasingly difficult after the revision.

I noticed that many people can go straight to the top 100 with an article, so I watched it with a learning mentality.

Basically, there are a few approaches:

1. Directly talk about the square activity itself, using topics like making money or losing money to attract traffic.

2. Directly discuss unrelated hot topics, tagging the activity, or the first half being unrelated, then hard pivoting to the activity project in the second half.

3. Use mutual evaluation and likes to leverage the push algorithm; interactions themselves will add points, and in the early stages, more interactions lead to more pushes.

4. Attract traffic through Twitter and other external platforms.

These indeed have an effect on view counts, much better than simply discussing projects. But whether it can become a viral hit also has a certain element of luck.

I also found that those who can produce viral hits daily basically have a certain number of followers; for those with a smaller follower base, it's much harder to replicate a viral hit, which should be related to the push algorithm; early interactions are really important.

Additionally, I saw some bloggers criticizing this practice, and later I realized that the demands of the project parties and Binance Square are different; the project parties seek exposure for their projects, but the tokens have already been given to Binance, and even at the moment the activity is launched, there is already huge exposure. Binance's demand is for the prosperity of the square, and mechanical marketing posts are also detrimental to the interaction of the square.

So I think Binance officials will turn a blind eye to those who go too far, suppressing them a bit to give the project parties an explanation, while letting those slightly related go; this is called using other people's money to do your own thing, which is much more effective than completing a KPI of one BNB a day. $ETH