These past two days while doing tasks in the Binance square, I've had an indescribable feeling: some people post an article and get exposure in the thousands or tens of thousands, while no matter how I post, I only get single-digit or double-digit exposure. Where exactly am I going wrong...?
It's not that I don't want to participate, but rather that after completing daily tasks, the exposure is just not there, which feels futile! As retail investors like us without a fan base, we simply can't compete with those big influencers in the square; many are just running alongside! What's even more ridiculous is that the AI articles with similar titles and nearly identical content occupy half of the square. When you open it and see a bunch of similar content, similar titles, and similar viewpoints, it really leads to aesthetic fatigue.
When I first started doing square tasks, it was quite pure, just for that little reward. Later, I gradually realized that if I just copy and paste, casually filling up the word count, it actually doesn't help myself much and doesn't help others much either.
Instead, those original posts that are written seriously are more likely to make me stop and take a second look. Some share their experiences participating in the ecosystem, some record interaction experiences, some complain about the pitfalls they've encountered, and others simply talk about their mindset changes. These contents may not be 'explosive', but they are very real.#Plasma
Slowly, I also prefer to spend time writing my own thoughts rather than picking up other people's words. Because I realize that a true ecosystem doesn't come from piling up tasks over a few days, but from long-term real discussions accumulating gradually.
If the square is long filled with templated content, then the ecosystem's enthusiasm may appear high, but it is actually very hollow. In contrast, if there are more and more original posts, even if the data is average, it indicates that there are real users participating and real voices emerging.
So rather than getting hung up on how many days are left in the task, it's better to focus on whether I can produce some valuable content. Speaking of the ecosystem itself, I have been paying more attention to Plasma-related content recently. One thing I feel quite positive about is that its ecosystem discussions are gradually shifting from the 'price level' to 'whether it can be used' and 'how good it is'. Plasma is doing a stablecoin public chain, and it has 0 gas fees; I've experienced it a few times, and it's very smooth!@Plasma
People have started to share application experiences, discuss features, and follow update progress. For me, this change is more important than short-term fluctuations. Because prices can be driven by emotions, the ecosystem can only be built through construction. Tasks will end, enthusiasm will change, but if there are still people discussing and using it continuously in the ecosystem, then this project still has vitality. This is also why I am now more willing to read more original works and write more original content.