With so many gaming chains, why can VANRY retain players?

Chain games have been popular several times, but how many can truly keep players engaged? Vanar seems to have figured out one principle: first have a good game, then talk about blockchain. Their self-incubated Virtua platform already has playable games.

This is quite different from other gaming chains. Many chains first set up the technology and then beg developers to create games. Vanar does it the other way around, first having games and users, and then optimizing the underlying chain based on demand. This application-driven approach to technology may be more stable.

You can see many game studio names in their list of partners. This is not a superficial partnership bought with money, but a genuine effort to put game logic on the chain. For example, making game items true digital assets that players can use across games is quite an interesting experience.

In terms of technical details, they have focused on optimizing transaction speed and cost. When playing a game, buying equipment or receiving rewards should not take a long time or cost a lot of money; otherwise, players won't tolerate it. Vanar can reduce the cost of a single transaction to almost negligible, which is crucial for in-game microtransaction scenarios.

In terms of ecological expansion, they provide a complete set of developer tools. Game teams do not need to learn complex blockchain programming from scratch; they can put game logic on the chain using familiar languages. Lowering the development threshold can attract more good games, forming a virtuous cycle.

Security assurance is not just about preventing hackers; it also needs to prevent cheating. The game assets and core logic on the Vanar chain run on the chain, making them harder to tamper with than traditional game servers. Although cheating cannot be completely eradicated, the threshold for cheating has been raised, providing protection for serious players.

There are already some game guilds in the community that are paying attention. Players' discussions are very practical, mainly concerned with whether the game is fun and worth it, rather than the fluctuations in coin prices. This community, supported by real demand, has a relatively solid foundation and won't dissipate because of market fluctuations.

I really have high hopes for Vanar's pragmatic style. They do not engage in empty talk about disruption but patiently solve one specific issue after another when it comes to putting games on the chain. When chain games are no longer a gimmick but a genuinely fun experience, the value of VANRY will naturally be seen by more people.

$VANRY @Vanar #Vanar