Did you think blockchain is just something that is completely open and transparent? But Dusk, this guy, is determined to hide its privacy, and has to dance to the tune of regulation. Isn't that contradictory? Haha, when I first encountered Dusk, I thought it was like a mysterious dusk knight—on the surface, it appears to be a Layer-1 blockchain focused on financial applications, but deep down it uses ZK-SNARKs to make transactions as private as a spy game, while still being able to selectively disclose data, perfectly complying with EU MiCA regulations and the like. Considering the current hot topic, RWA tokenization is booming, and Dusk is just bridging the gap, allowing traditional financial institutions to sneak onto the chain without losing their compliance face.
I believe the biggest highlight of Dusk is its multi-layer architecture upgrade: the underlying DuskDS manages data and settlement, the middle DuskEVM runs EVM execution, and the upper DuskVM specializes in privacy. This not only makes settlement fast to the second, but is also energy-efficient, avoiding the power-hungry issues of PoW. To be professional, it uses Segregated Byzantine Agreement consensus, which is tamper-proof without sacrificing speed, more aligned with institutional needs than those old privacy coins like Monero. But here comes the contradiction: in the wild growth era of DeFi, can Dusk's "privacy + compliance" double-edged sword attract big players on board? In my view, it has enormous development potential, especially now with the integration of AI and blockchain, Dusk's privacy layer can prevent data leaks, but the challenge lies in persuading conservative banks to stop being so timid. In short, Dusk is not just for fun; it is quietly reshaping the twilight boundary of finance—are you willing to take a gamble?
