#vanar @Vanar #Vanar

Good evening, friends. I am Wuxue. Today, let's change our perspective. Instead of starting from emotions, let's analyze whether the system design is valid and re-examine Vanar Chain and $VANRY .

Currently, many project issues are not technical but logical—the key is whether the system can actually operate, regardless of how many functions are added. Vanar Chain has a relatively rare advantage: its design is focused on being 'operational in the long term' rather than piling modules around 'short-term narratives'.

Look at the chain itself. Vanar Chain emphasizes stable, low-volatility usage costs rather than extreme TPS. This is extremely important for real-world applications. Enterprises, game studios, and content platforms calculate their accounts annually or monthly, not based on peak performance on a single day. When transaction fees can be precisely anticipated, the blockchain will transform from an 'experimental tool' into 'infrastructure'.

Now let's talk about Neutron. Many people underestimate its significance by viewing it simply as a storage solution. Neutron is not about 'storing files', but about transforming data into verifiable and reusable semantic units. This means that on-chain data has, for the first time, the value of being directly invoked by AI and applications. If this step is validated, Vanar Chain will not follow the traditional public chain route but rather the 'data infrastructure' route.

I am also quite interested in the subscription model of myNeutron. It indicates one thing: Vanar Chain has begun to attempt to commoditize blockchain services rather than relying solely on token sentiment to maintain system operation. Paying with $VANRY to exchange for real cost savings; if this model works, the way it supports token value will be very different.

As for $VANRY, it essentially plays the role of a 'system coordinator'. The coexistence of gas, staking, governance, and incentives means that its demand does not come from a single point but from the operation of the entire network. Such tokens are not easy to explode but are also not easy to fail.

Finally, let’s conclude. Vanar Chain is still in the validation phase; there are certainly risks, but it is at least doing one correct thing—focusing attention on whether the system can be used long-term. For me, the only three indicators to watch next are: on-chain call frequency, the number of real paying users, and developer retention rate. Once these data come out, the conclusions will naturally emerge.