ETH Price Drops 3.4% as $850 Million Liquidation Spurs High Volume and Market Volatility
Ethereum (ETHUSDT) experienced notable price volatility over the last 24 hours, with a 3.40% decrease from 2424.82 to 2342.40 on Binance. This price movement is primarily attributed to significant market liquidations, increased bearish sentiment, and broader declines across major cryptocurrencies. Reports of high-value trader losses, substantial liquidation events totaling $850 million, and heightened sell signals contributed to downward pressure. Meanwhile, the Ethereum Foundation’s focus on network security enhancements, including quantum threat mitigation, signals long-term priorities but did not offset short-term market concerns. Trading volume surged to approximately $49 billion, indicating increased market activity amid the downturn. Ethereum remains the #2 ranked cryptocurrency with a circulating supply of 120.69 million ETH.
WAL Token: Community and Ecosystem Allocation
@WalrusProtocol Token allocations used to be a footnote; lately they’re the headline everywhere, and with $WAL the allocation story is tied directly to what the Walrus protocol is trying to be: a storage and data layer for applications, built on Sui, where data can be published, verified, and reused. WAL isn’t just a “governance token” in the abstract either—it’s meant to pay for storage, support staking, and enable on-chain decision-making.
That’s why community and ecosystem allocation matters here. Walrus says over 60% of supply goes to the community via airdrops, subsidies, and a Community Reserve, with common breakdowns pointing to 43% in the reserve plus separate user drops and storage subsidies. The topic is trending again because exchange programs like Binance HODLer Airdrops and listings pushed $WAL to a wider audience, and new holders immediately ask the practical questions: who controls the reserve, what standards guide ecosystem support, and how spending is reported over time.
@WalrusProtocol $WAL #walrus #Walrus
Vanar gives me the feeling of a project that cares more about function than noise.
Instead of chasing trends, they’re focusing on building an L1 that makes sense for real products: games, AI-driven apps, digital experiences, and brand platforms that normal users can interact with. The goal isn’t to impress crypto natives, it’s to make blockchain invisible in the background.
What I find interesting is the way they’re thinking about long-term application behavior. Persistent data, automation, and systems that can adapt over time. That’s the kind of foundation real consumer apps need.
The push toward proper payment infrastructure also says a lot. Stablecoins, smooth settlement, and practical rails matter more than flashy features.
$VANRY powers this entire setup, while still staying connected to existing liquidity on Ethereum.
No hype campaigns.
No empty promises.
Just steady construction.
That’s why Vanar stays on my radar.
#Vanar @Vanar $VANRY #vanar
{spot}(VANRYUSDT)
💥🚨SHOCKING: TRUMP SAYS GREENLAND WILL BE OURS NO MATTER WHAT, EVEN IF WE HAVE TO TAKE IT BY FORCE 🇺🇸
$ZK $BULLA $ZORA
President Trump recently revealed that the U.S. has started negotiations over Greenland and he thinks the deal is “pretty well agreed to.” But the shocking part? Trump implied that if negotiations fail, the U.S. won’t hesitate to assert control by any means necessary.
Greenland is not just ice and snow—it’s a strategic goldmine. Its Arctic position controls key shipping routes, and it’s packed with rare earth minerals and untapped resources critical for technology and defense. This is why Trump is so focused on it.
Experts say this move signals America’s intent to dominate the Arctic, safeguard military and economic interests, and send a loud warning to China, Russia, and Europe: “We play hard when it comes to strategic assets.”
For now, it’s in the negotiation phase, but history shows that Trump’s negotiations often have an aggressive edge. If Greenland truly becomes a U.S. priority, it could reshape Arctic geopolitics and global power dynamics in the years to come.
⚠️ This is more than a land grab—it’s a strategic game changer for the U.S. and the world.
What is the real argument that BTC is not heading to $0?
Beyond the idea that the crowd keeps it alive through shared belief, what is the actual foundation that stops something with no physical backing from eventually collapsing in value?
Take MSTR for example. Their average cost sits around $76,000, and when you stack that against the massive runs we have seen in equities and metals over the past five years, the payoff does not exactly scream conviction.
And about the analysts. Tom Lee came in loud with that January 31 BTC call and we all saw how that played out. At this point, do people genuinely still lean on analyst projections for an asset that moves mostly on sentiment, liquidity, and leverage?
I hold a small amount of BTC and it is currently down, but that is also why I never went heavy. When you strip everything back, the case for Bitcoin going to $0 sometimes feels just as plausible as the case for it pushing toward $100,000.
So I keep asking myself, is the long term support rooted in real structural demand, or are we still operating inside a belief system that only works as long as enough people agree to believe in it?
$ETH Analysis + Next Move 🚨📉
$ETH is witnessing a brutal liquidation phase, with the price currently struggling at $2,346.46. After failing to sustain momentum near the $3,402.89 peak, the market has entered a sharp downward spiral, dropping over 52% from its recent highs in a wider market rout. The second-largest cryptocurrency is now trading in deep red as sellers aggressively de-risk across the board.
🔍 The Quick Analysis:
The daily chart structure is a bearish nightmare. Ethereum has sliced through critical support levels at $2,623 and $2,475, leaving it exposed to a deeper correction. Technical indicators are flashing "Strong Sell" across all major timeframes, with the 50-day and 200-day moving averages both trending above the current price, acting as heavy overhead resistance. While the RSI has dipped into oversold territory around 33.67, indicating the selling might be exhausted, the MACD confirms that bearish momentum is still firmly in control.
Real Talks: The bulls have been liquidated into oblivion. Trying to time this bottom is a gamble—wait for a confirmed reversal or get out of the way. 🛑🧠
🎯🔮 THE NEXT MOVE 🔮🎯
* The Bearish Abyss: If $ETH fails to hold the current support zone, the next major demand floor stands at $2,250. A break below this psychological level could trigger a massive slide toward $1,881, representing a catastrophic 25% further decline from current levels. 📉🎯
* The Bullish Dead Cat: Any recovery attempt will face immediate resistance at $2,475 and $2,623. Bulls need to reclaim $2,900 just to breathe, but a true trend reversal requires a decisive daily close above the $3,130 resistance zone. 🚀⚡
* Bottom Line: Eth is in a high-stakes battle for survival. Watch the $2,250 level like a hawk; if that snaps, the floor is officially gone and we head into the abyss. 🛑💀
Would you like me to analyze any other pair from your watchlist?
I watch ecosystems grow quietly.
In 2024, after years of incentive-driven expansion, traders began tracking where builders actually stayed. Ecosystem growth stopped meaning “how many apps launched” and started meaning “how many kept working.” That shift makes Plasma’s ecosystem strategy easier to read.
In simple terms, an ecosystem is the network of developers, tools, and users around a chain. @Plasma focuses on compatibility, predictable settlement, and stablecoin-first flows, which lowers friction for builders. Progress here has been steady, not explosive, with tooling improving alongside usage.
I trust ecosystems that grow by habit, not rewards. Philosophically, durable growth doesn’t announce itself. It repeats quietly until it becomes normal.
@Plasma #Plasma $XPL
{spot}(XPLUSDT)
💥🚨BREAKING: TRUMP & IRAN SIGNAL POSSIBLE DEAL! 🇺🇸🇮🇷
$ZK $BULLA $ZORA
Iranian Foreign Minister Araghchi just confirmed something huge: Trump’s demand of “no nuclear weapons” is fully accepted by Iran. He called it a very good starting point for a deal.
In return, Iran is expecting sanctions to be lifted, which could make a historic agreement possible. Araghchi added a warning: “Let’s not talk about impossible things,” signaling Iran is serious but realistic.
This is massive because it shows both sides are talking seriously for the first time in a long while. After years of tension, Trump’s approach seems to be creating room for negotiation, not just threats.
If this deal moves forward, it could reshape Middle East geopolitics, affect oil markets, and even ease global tensions. The next few weeks will be critical — any slip could make or break this fragile window.
This could be Trump’s boldest diplomatic move yet, balancing pressure with negotiation, and keeping the world on edge.