Sometimes the most honest research starts with a refusal, not a recommendation.

Inner Question: If I had to reject Vanar today, what would be the most honest reason?

It might be structural, not emotional: a roadmap that feels too certain for consumer-scale delivery, a threat model that doesn’t clearly name the real attackers (scams, partners, infrastructure chokepoints), or a token role that sounds broad but stays hard to pin down. It might be the reliance on incentives that can mimic “adoption” for a while.

If I can’t explain, in plain words, who is accountable when something breaks—why am I saying “yes” today? @Vanarchain #vanar $VANRY

VANRY

0.006508

+2.92%