Vanar talks about real-world adoption through games, entertainment, and brands. But adoption is rarely blocked by tech alone.

Inner question: what non-technical dependency could stop this?

Distribution is one. If wallets, exchanges, and on/off-ramps don’t make Vanar the default path, users won’t arrive. Compliance is another. Brand partners won’t risk unclear standards for custody, fraud, refunds, and support when something breaks. And attention is a third: consumer products need consistent community trust, not just launch-week noise.

So the real test isn’t whether the chain works in isolation. It’s whether the non-technical rails—partners, policies, regions, and support—can hold under pressure. What dependency would fail first?@Vanarchain #vanar $VANRY

VANRY
VANRY
--
--