#vanar $VANRY Most online systems today are built around human attention. Social feeds measure clicks, watch time, comments. Even on Binance Square, posts rise or fall based on how long people read and whether they interact. The infrastructure underneath is designed to respond to human behavior patterns.
But AI does not consume content the way we do. It doesn’t scroll. It doesn’t react emotionally. It processes data, context, and structured signals. That difference matters. Many blockchains were built for human-triggered transactions. A person connects a wallet, signs a message, confirms a swap. The system assumes a human decision at every step.
VanarChain seems to lean in another direction. Its architecture appears shaped around the idea that AI agents, meaning software systems that can act autonomously, will interact with the network directly. For that to work, the chain must support persistent context and machine-scale interaction, not just occasional manual clicks. In simple terms, it has to hold structured memory and allow continuous automated execution.
There are risks in designing infrastructure around machine activity. If AI agents dominate transaction flow, human users might feel secondary. Governance becomes more complex. Verification becomes harder. Still, the idea is interesting. Instead of chasing human attention, the network prepares for machine attention. And if that shift becomes normal, it could quietly redefine what a blockchain is actually optimized for.