excellent

I’ve been paying close attention to how indie studios are choosing their tech stacks lately, and one pattern keeps showing up: more small teams are quietly building on Vanar Chain — and not for hype, but for practical reasons.

When indie developers talk about infrastructure, they’re not chasing buzzwords. They care about three things: cost, control, and speed. From the testimonials and builder chats I’ve followed, Vanar keeps coming up because it reduces friction where small studios usually struggle most.

First is predictable costs. Indie teams can’t afford surprise gas spikes or bloated deployment fees. They want to ship features, test mechanics, and iterate quickly without worrying that every on-chain action will break the budget. Low and stable transaction costs change how confidently they experiment.

Second is built-in asset logic. Instead of duct-taping ownership, rewards, and marketplace features after launch, developers are baking them in from day one. That means items, identities, and creator assets are structured to be tradable and reusable without extra platform negotiations. For a small studio, that removes layers of legal and technical overhead.

Third is audience alignment. Indies thrive on community-first growth. Infrastructure that supports transparent rewards, collectible access, and creator royalties fits naturally with how these teams build and engage players.

What stands out to me is this: indie studios are not asking, “Is this trendy?” They’re asking, “Does this remove blockers?” When the tech disappears into the workflow and lets them focus on gameplay and community, adoption follows naturally.

@Vanarchain $VANRY #Vanar